Environmental impact of milk and electricity production from dairy farms with biogas plants of different size and feeding system

被引:3
|
作者
Fusi, Mara [1 ]
Pirlo, Giacomo [1 ]
机构
[1] Council Agr Res & Econ, Res Ctr Anim Prod & Aquaculture, CREA, Via Antonio Lombardo 11, I-26900 Lodi, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment; System expansion; Milk; Electricity; Anaerobic digestion; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENERGY CROPS; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135445
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is an effective method to decrease the environmental impact of milk production and to generate renewable energy. A dairy farm with an annexed biogas plant produces three outputs, milk, meat and electricity, and should be considered as a single system for the evaluation of the environmental impact. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the size and feeding methods of the biogas plants in three dairy farms with different features affect the environmental impact related to the milk and electricity produced. The first farm was characterized by a biogas plant of 300 kW fed only with cattle manure, the second farm had a plant of 526 kW fed with cattle manure, maize silage and waste of maize grain production, while the third farm had a biogas plant of 999 kW fed with cattle and poultry manure, maize and triticale silage, and fats from slaugh-terhouse waste. The Life Cycle Assessment involved the environmental impact of Fat Protein Corrected Milk (FPCM), in the first instance with meat and electricity from biogas considered with an economic allocation, and then considered a credit. Successively, the environmental consequences of electricity were evaluated considering milk and meat as credits. With the economic allocation, Carbon Footprint (CFP) of one kg of FPCM was 0.82, 0.85 and 0.72 kg CO2 eq in the first, second and third farm, respectively. In all the three farms, electricity generation from biogas determined a reduction in the environmental impact of milk production thanks to a credit of emissions provided by the production of renewable energy. Milk CFP in the three farms was 0.82, 0.91 and 0.13 kg CO2 eq respectively, with mitigation from biogas of 11%, 11% and 85%. The best performances were obtained in the third farm thanks to higher levels of electricity generation, covered digestate storage and the large use of agri-industrial waste. Electricity CFP in the farms was-0.74,-0.68 and-0.06 kg CO2 eq/kWh respectively. Environmental consequences of electricity production from biogas plants were compensated in all the farms thanks to the credits provided by milk; this compensation was as greater as the ratio between milk and electricity production and the first farm reached better outcomes. In the context of reducing the environmental impact of animal foods and implementing an ecological transition to reach national and European goals for renewable energy production, the work could be beneficial to assess which combination between dairy and energy products should be promoted.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors influencing the carbon footprint of milk production on dairy farms with different feeding strategies in western Europe
    Sorley, Marion
    Casey, Imelda
    Styles, David
    Merino, Pilar
    Trindade, Henrique
    Mulholland, Martin
    Zafra, Cesar Resch
    Keatinge, Ray
    Le Gallj, Andre
    O'Brien, Donal
    Humphreys, James
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435
  • [2] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION FROM BIOGAS IN PALESTINE
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Baboun, Samer H.
    Demery, Falah
    Aburdeineh, Iyad
    Fiala, Marco
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 15 (09): : 1915 - 1922
  • [3] Environmental impact of milk production from samples of organic and conventional farms in Lombardy (Italy)
    Pirlo, G.
    Lolli, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 : 962 - 971
  • [4] Providing Electricity Requirements by Biogas Production and Its Environmental Benefit in Sample Dairy Farms of Iran
    Sefeedpari, Paria
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Akram, Asadollah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 2 (03): : 384 - 387
  • [5] Management options to reduce the environmental impact of dairy goat milk production
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Lovarelli, Daniela
    Celozzi, Stefania
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Sandrucci, Anna
    Bava, Luciana
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2020, 231
  • [6] Appraisal of environmental profiles of pasture-based milk production: a case study of dairy farms in the Waikato region, New Zealand
    Chobtang, Jeerasak
    Ledgard, Stewart F.
    McLaren, Sarah J.
    Zonderland-Thomassen, Marlies
    Donaghy, Daniel J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (03) : 311 - 325
  • [7] The impact of biogas production on the organic carbon input to the soil of Dutch dairy farms: A substance flow analysis
    Dieu Linh Hoang
    Wiersema, Brienne
    Moll, Henri C.
    Nonhebel, Sanderine
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (02) : 491 - 508
  • [8] Innovating feeding strategies in dairy sheep farming can reduce environmental impact of ewe milk
    Bosco, Simona
    Volpi, Iride
    Cappucci, Alice
    Mantino, Alberto
    Ragaglini, Giorgio
    Bonari, Enrico
    Mele, Marcello
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 20 (01) : 2147 - 2163
  • [9] Environmental impact of electricity from selected geothermal power plants in Italy
    Bravi, Mirko
    Basosi, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 66 : 301 - 308
  • [10] Environmental impact assessment of the production of biomethane from landfill biogas and its use as vehicle fuel
    Godoy, Veronica
    Martin-Lara, Maria Angeles
    Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo
    Arjandas, Sunil
    Calero, Monica
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 237