Multiphase flow and geomechanical responses of interbedded hydrate reservoirs during depressurization gas production for deepwater environment

被引:9
作者
Yuan, Yilong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gong, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Tianfu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Huixing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resources & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Water Resources & Water Environm Jilin Pro, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Engn Res Ctr Geothermal Resources Dev Technol & Eq, Minist Educ, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Natural gas hydrate; Heterogeneous hydrate-reservoir; Depressurization; Multiphase flow; Geomechanical response; Numerical simulation; SCALE EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; STRATIGRAPHIC TEST WELL; PRODUCTION TEST-SITE; SHENHU AREA; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; THERMAL-STIMULATION; NANKAI TROUGH; FLUID-FLOW; STABILITY; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.125603
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The coupled multiphase flow and geomechanical responses are very important considerations in planning offshore hydrate production. In this work, a novel thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) coupled simulator has been developed to investigate the THM responses of interbedded hydrate reservoirs using depressurization method in the offshore India. Based on the detailed geological data at the NGHP-02-16 site, a more realistic hydrate reservoir model is constructed to analyze the unique multiphase flow and geomechanical responses induced by depressurization. The results indicate that the average gas production rate of this work is 6370 ST m3/d, which is significantly lower than the previous numerical result of about 9000 ST m3/d using the same 3 MPa production pressure. This is mainly because the geomechanical response gives negative feedback to flow through the stress -dependent porosity and permeability. The reservoir heterogeneity results in the non-uniform hydrate dissocia-tion and effective stress changes in the marine sediments. The depressurization results in significant increase of shear stress and vertical compaction in the hydrate reservoir. The maximum shear stress is no more than 2 MPa and is mainly concentrated in the top and bottom regions of the production interval. The maximum seafloor subsidence is 1.15 m during 100 days depressurization test. Sensitivity analysis results suggest that the pro-duction pressure and perforation length are two important parameters affect the gas productivity and mechanical stability. The low production pressure is recommended under the premise of mechanical stability for gas pro-duction from hydrate reservoirs. Perforation in the underlying water-saturated sand layer will lead to more serious water production and seafloor subsidence. The coupled multiphase flow and geomechanical results presented in this work are helpful to design the safe hydrate production scheme in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Chemo-thermo-mechanically coupled seismic analysis of methane hydrate-bearing sediments during a predicted Nankai Trough Earthquake [J].
Akaki, T. ;
Kimoto, S. ;
Oka, F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2016, 40 (16) :2207-2237
[2]   Regional long-term production modeling from a single well test, Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope [J].
Anderson, Brian J. ;
Kurihara, Masanori ;
White, Mark D. ;
Moridis, George J. ;
Wilson, Scott J. ;
Pooladi-Darvish, Mehran ;
Gaddipati, Manohar ;
Masuda, Yoshihiro ;
Collett, Timothy S. ;
Hunter, Robert B. ;
Narita, Hideo ;
Rose, Kelly ;
Boswell, Ray .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) :493-501
[3]   Modified Darcy's law, Terzaghi's effective stress principle and Fick's law for swelling clay soils [J].
Bennethum, LS ;
Murad, MA ;
Cushman, JH .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 1997, 20 (3-4) :245-266
[4]   India National Gas Hydrate Program Expedition 02 summary of scientific results: Evaluation of natural gas-hydrate-bearing pressure cores [J].
Boswell, Ray ;
Yoneda, Jun ;
Waite, William F. .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2019, 108 :143-153
[5]   India National Gas Hydrate Program Expedition 02 summary of scientific results: Numerical simulation of reservoir response to depressurization [J].
Boswell, Ray ;
Myshakin, Evgeniy ;
Moridis, George ;
Konno, Yoshihiro ;
Collett, Timothy S. ;
Reagan, Matthew ;
Ajayi, Taiwo ;
Seol, Yongkoo .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2019, 108 :154-166
[6]   Methane hydrate formation in excess water simulating marine locations and the impact of thermal stimulation on energy recovery [J].
Chong, Zheng Rong ;
Pujar, Girish Anand ;
Yang, Mingjun ;
Linga, Praveen .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 177 :409-421
[7]   Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: Prospects and challenges [J].
Chong, Zheng Rong ;
Yang, She Hern Bryan ;
Babu, Ponnivalavan ;
Linga, Praveen ;
Li, Xiao-Sen .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 162 :1633-1652
[8]   India National Gas Hydrate Program Expedition 02 Summary of Scientific Results: Gas hydrate systems along the eastern continental margin of India [J].
Collett, Timothy S. ;
Boswell, Ray ;
Waite, William F. ;
Kumar, Pushpendra ;
Roy, Sandip Kumar ;
Chopra, Krishan ;
Singh, Sunil Kumar ;
Yamada, Yasuhiro ;
Tenma, Norio ;
Pohlman, John ;
Zyrianova, Margarita .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2019, 108 :39-142
[9]   Permeability anisotropy and relative permeability in sediments from the National Gas Hydrate Program Expedition 02, offshore India [J].
Dai, Sheng ;
Kim, Jongchan ;
Xu, Yue ;
Waite, William F. ;
Jang, Junbong ;
Yoneda, Jun ;
Collett, Timothy S. ;
Kumar, Pushpendra .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2019, 108 :705-713
[10]   Experimental validation of kinetic inhibitor strength on natural gas hydrate nucleation [J].
Daraboina, Nagu ;
Pachitsas, Stylianos ;
von Solms, Nicolas .
FUEL, 2015, 139 :554-560