Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review

被引:273
作者
Kaur, Davinder [1 ]
Uslu, Suleyman [1 ]
Rittichier, Kaley J. [1 ]
Durresi, Arjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Comp & Informat Sci, 723 W Michigan St, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; machine learning; black-box problem; trustworthy AI; explainable AI; fairness; explainability; accountability; privacy; acceptance; BIG DATA; ALGORITHM; ACCEPTANCE; FRAMEWORK; ANONYMITY; FAIRNESS; SYSTEMS; ETHICS; TRUST; AL;
D O I
10.1145/3491209
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic decision making are having a profound impact on our daily lives. These systems are vastly used in different high-stakes applications like healthcare, business, government, education, and justice, moving us toward a more algorithmic society. However, despite so many advantages of these systems, they sometimes directly or indirectly cause harm to the users and society. Therefore, it has become essential to make these systems safe, reliable, and trustworthy. Several requirements, such as fairness, explainability, accountability, reliability, and acceptance, have been proposed in this direction to make these systems trustworthy. This survey analyzes all of these different requirements through the lens of the literature. It provides an overview of different approaches that can help mitigate AI risks and increase trust and acceptance of the systems by utilizing the users and society. It also discusses existing strategies for validating and verifying these systems and the current standardization efforts for trustworthy AI. Finally, we present a holistic view of the recent advancements in trustworthy AI to help the interested researchers grasp the crucial facets of the topic efficiently and offer possible future research directions.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 228 条
[21]   'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions [J].
Binns, Reuben ;
Van Kleek, Max ;
Veale, Michael ;
Lyngs, Ulrik ;
Zhao, Jun ;
Shadbolt, Nigel .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
[22]   FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transport [J].
Black, Emily ;
Yeom, Samuel ;
Fredrikson, Matt .
FAT* '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2020, :111-121
[23]  
Bogen Miranda, 2018, HELPWANTED EXAMINATI
[24]  
Bolukbasi T, 2016, ADV NEUR IN, V29
[25]  
Bourtoule L, 2021, P IEEE S SECUR PRIV, P141, DOI 10.1109/SP40001.2021.00019
[26]  
Boyens J., 2015, NIST Special publication, V800, P32, DOI 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-161
[28]  
Brennan-Marquez K, 2017, VANDERBILT LAW REV, V70, P1249
[29]   Big Data and security policies: Towards a framework for regulating the phases of analytics and use of Big Data [J].
Broeders, Dennis ;
Schrijvers, Erik ;
van der Sloot, Bart ;
van Brakel, Rosamunde ;
de Hoog, Josta ;
Bailin, Ernst Hirsch .
COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2017, 33 (03) :309-323
[30]  
Brunet Marc-Etienne, 2019, PR MACH LEARN RES, P803