Cost Savings and Waste Reduction Through Redispensing Unused Oral Anticancer Drugs The ROAD Study

被引:17
作者
Smale, Elisabeth M. [1 ,2 ]
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. [2 ,3 ]
Heerdink, Eibert R. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Desar, Ingrid M. E. [7 ]
Egberts, Toine C. G. [4 ,5 ]
Bekker, Charlotte L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Geert Grootepl Zuid 10,Route 864,POB 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Pharm, Ubbergen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Clin Pharm, Div Lab Genet & Pharm, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Clin Pharmacol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Utrecht Univ Appl Med Ctr, Res Grp Innovat Pharmaceut Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; MEDICINES;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4865
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Importance New strategies targeting waste are required to improve financial and ecologic sustainability of expensive therapies, such as oral anticancer drugs, that frequently remain unused by patients. Redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs seems to be a promising strategy when drug quality is guaranteed.Objectives To determine the waste reduction and net cost savings attained by redispensing oral anticancer drugs that go unused by patients compared with the standard practice of disposal.Design, Settings, and Participants The ROAD study was a prospective single-group intervention conducted in the outpatient pharmacies of 4 hospitals in the Netherlands from February 1, 2021, to February 1, 2023, with 12-month follow-up of each patient. Patients with cancer and who had a prescription for an oral anticancer drug that could be stored at room temperature were included. Of 2426 eligible patients, 602 did not consent and 601 did not respond. Data analyses were performed from August 25, 2022, to April 19, 2023.Intervention Participants received oral anticancer drugs for use at home in special packaging (ie, sealed packaging with time-temperature indicator), to be returned to the pharmacy should these remain unused. The pharmacy ensured quality of returned drugs based on authenticity, appearance, remaining shelf life and adequate storage temperature. Drugs fulfilling quality requirements were redispensed to other patients.Main Outcome and Measure Total waste reduction and mean net annual cost savings per patient compared with the standard practice of disposal. Optimization of cost savings was explored by introducing variations in the quality assurance procedure and patient population. All analyses used the average exchange rate for 2021 <euro>1 = US $ 1.18.Results Of 1223 patients with cancer who consented, 1071 participated (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-75] years; 622 [58.1%] were male). In all, 171 patients (16.0%; 95% CI, 13.8%-18.3%) returned 335 unused oral anticancer drug packages. Of the returned drugs, 228 packages were redispensed, which reduced waste by 68.1% (95% CI, 67.7%-68.5%) compared with the standard practice (disposal). Redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs comprised 2.4% (95% CI, 2.2%-2.5%) of total drug costs, providing mean net annual cost savings of US $680 (95% CI, $524-$837) up to $1591 (95% CI, $1226-$2002) per participant.Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this multicenter intervention study indicate that redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs is associated with waste reduction and cost savings, which in turn may improve the affordability and sustainability of cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 94
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   How do people conceptualise the reuse of medicines? An interview study [J].
Alhamad, Hamza ;
Patel, Nilesh ;
Donyai, Parastou .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2018, 26 (03) :232-241
[2]   Quantity and economic value of unused oral anti-cancer and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs among outpatient pharmacy patients who discontinue therapy [J].
Bekker, C. L. ;
Melis, E. J. ;
Egberts, A. C. G. ;
Bouvy, M. L. ;
Gardarsdottir, H. ;
van den Bemt, B. J. F. .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (01) :100-105
[3]   What does it cost to redispense unused medications in the pharmacy? A micro-costing study [J].
Bekker, Charlotte L. ;
Gardarsdottir, Helga ;
Egberts, Antoine C. G. ;
Molenaar, Hendrik A. ;
Bouvy, Marcel L. ;
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. ;
Hovels, Anke M. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
[4]   Redispensing of unused HIV post-exposure prophylaxis for medical students [J].
Bekker, Charlotte L. ;
Kalicharan, Raween W. ;
Melis, Eward J. ;
Gardarsdottir, Helga ;
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. ;
Bouvy, Marcel L. ;
van Maarseveen, Erik M. ;
Egberts, Antoine C. G. .
TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 29 :82-83
[5]   Redispensing of medicines unused by patients: a qualitative study among stakeholders [J].
Bekker, Charlotte L. ;
Gardarsdottir, Helga ;
Egberts, Toine C. G. ;
Bouvy, Marcel L. ;
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2017, 39 (01) :196-204
[6]  
Bretti Sergio, 2014, Tumori, V100, pe94, DOI 10.1700/1578.17246
[7]  
Crews J, 2019, ONCOL ISSUE, V34
[8]   Economic Cost and Sustainability of Oral Therapies in Precision Oncology [J].
Desai, Aakash P. ;
Scheckel, Caleb J. ;
Soderberg, Leah C. ;
Jensen, Chelsee J. ;
Orme, Jacob J. ;
Tella, Sri H. ;
Kommalapati, Anuhya ;
Pritchett, Joshua C. ;
Khera, Nandita ;
Mahipal, Amit ;
Go, Ronald S. .
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (08) :563-+
[9]  
Deutsch Sarah, 2016, J Oncol Pharm Pract, V22, P68, DOI 10.1177/1078155214547664
[10]   Stakeholder Views on the Idea of Medicines Reuse in the UK [J].
Donyai, Parastou ;
McCrindle, Rachel ;
Hui, Terence K. L. ;
Sherratt, R. Simon .
PHARMACY, 2021, 9 (02)