Evaluation of the Quality and Comprehensiveness of YouTube Videos Discussing Pancreatic Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Didier, Alexander J. [1 ]
Fang, Lauren [1 ]
Stiene, Jennifer [1 ]
Spencer, Caleb T. [1 ]
Hamouda, Danae M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Coll Med & Life Sci, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Med Ctr, Toledo, OH USA
关键词
YouTube; Pancreatic cancer; Patient information; Social media; Oncology; Misinformation; PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTIONS; CONCORDANCE; INFORMATION; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-023-02355-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal diseases worldwide and incidence continues to rise, resulting in increased deaths each year. In the modern era, patients often turn to online sources like YouTube for information regarding their disease, which may be subject to a high degree of bias and misinformation; previous analyses have demonstrated low quality of other cancer-related YouTube videos. Thus, we sought to determine if patients can rely on educational YouTube videos for accurate and comprehensive information about pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment. We designed a search query and inclusion/exclusion criteria based on published studies evaluating YouTube user tendencies, which were used to identify videos most likely watched by patients. Videos were evaluated based on two well-known criteria, the DISCERN and JAMA tools, as well as a tool published by Sahin et al. to evaluate the comprehensiveness of YouTube videos. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square analysis to compare categorical variables. We used linear regression to assess for correlations between quantitative variables. Kruskal-Wallis and independent samples t-test were used to compare means between groups. We assessed inter-rater reliability using Cronbach's alpha. After the initial search query, 39 videos were retrieved that met inclusion criteria. The comprehensiveness and quality of these materials was generally low to moderate, with only 7 videos being considered comprehensive. Pearson's R demonstrated strong correlations between video length and both comprehensiveness and quality. Higher-quality videos also tended to be newer. YouTube videos regarding pancreatic cancer are generally of low to moderate quality and lack comprehensiveness, which could affect patients' perceptions of their disease or understanding of treatment options. These videos, which have collectively been viewed over 6 million times, should be subject to some form of expert review before upload, and producers of this content should consider citing the sources used in the video.
引用
收藏
页码:1894 / 1900
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the quality, reliability, and popularity of Turkish YouTube videos on acne treatment
    Kaya, Ozge
    Solak, Sezgi Sarikaya
    TURKDERM-TURKISH ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (04): : 166 - 171
  • [32] Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos about Insulin Injection in Children
    Turhan, Banu
    DUZCE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (03) : 234 - 241
  • [33] Evaluation of the Quality of Peri-implantitis Videos on YouTube
    Baris, Kubilay
    Hendek, Meltem Karsiyaka
    Olgun, Ebru
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (06) : 1813 - 1816
  • [34] Evaluation of quality and utility of YouTube vitreoretinal surgical videos
    Adami Lucatto, Luiz Filipe
    Bastos Prazeres, Juliana Moura
    Leitao Guerra, Ricardo Luz
    Arantes, Rafael
    Sandoval Barbosa, Gabriel Castilho
    Badaro, Emmerson
    Lima, Luiz H.
    Rodrigues, Eduardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETINA AND VITREOUS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [35] Evaluation of the Content, Reliability, and Quality of YouTube Videos on Surgical Hand Scrubbing
    Dagci, Mahmut
    Alptekin, Hatice Merve
    Ihtiyar, Deren
    Ozturk, Gamze
    Ozturk, Hazal
    AORN JOURNAL, 2025, 121 (04) : e1 - e10
  • [36] Assessment of quality and reliability of YouTube videos for patient and physician education on inflammatory myositis
    Joshi, Mrudula
    Naveen, R.
    Jagtap, Kshitij
    Gupta, Ria
    Agarwal, Vikas
    Aggarwal, Rohit
    Goel, Ashish
    Gupta, Latika
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 42 (05) : 1339 - 1349
  • [37] Accuracy, Quality, and Misinformation of YouTube AbortionProcedural Videos:Cross-Sectional Study
    Acero, Nicole
    Herrero, Emma
    Foncham, Juanita
    Mcilvaine, Jamie
    Kayaalp, Emre
    Figueora, Melissa
    Oladipo, Antonia Francis
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [38] Evaluation of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy videos on YouTube
    Ozcan, Cihat
    Sanci, Adem
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (08) : 1843 - 1847
  • [39] EVALUATION OF QUALITY AND RELIABILITY OF YOUTUBE EDUCATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY VIDEOS
    Karcioglu, Oguz
    Yuce, Hande
    Uysal, Serkan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 10 (01): : 1198 - 1203
  • [40] Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
    Chaudhary, Kapil
    Chandna, Abhishek
    Devana, Sudheer Kumar
    Sharma, Aditya Prakash
    Tyagi, Shantanu
    Singh, Shrawan K.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 8