Return to Duty in Military Service Members Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

被引:0
作者
Cognetti, Daniel J. [1 ]
Anderson, Kevin D. [1 ]
Handcox, Jordan E. [2 ]
Jorgensen, Anton Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Antonio, TX 78234 USA
[2] UT Hlth San Antonio, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Ortho San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78209 USA
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; DYSFUNCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usad330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction As the utilization of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) continues to expand, a better understanding of postoperative outcomes is needed, particularly in young and active individuals. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of this procedure in an active duty military population by examining return-to-duty (RTD) rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of the electronic medical record from a tertiary military medical center was performed for active duty service members undergoing SIJF from January 2013 to January 2019. The primary outcome measured was RTD at 6 months, with active duty status at 1 year, last follow-up, and revision surgery as secondary outcomes. Demographic and surgical variables recorded included patient age, gender, military rank, utilization of navigation, and implant type. Results Sixteen service members met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 40.5 & PLUSMN; 6.7 years. The mean follow-up after surgery was 24 & PLUSMN; 15 months. Patients received either cylindrical (n = 6) or triangular (n = 10) implants placed with (n = 6) or without (n = 10) navigation. Within 6 months of surgery, 56% of patients were able to RTD. Patients undergoing navigation-assisted procedures were significantly more likely to RTD at 6 months (100% vs. 30%, P = .011) compared to those undergoing surgery performed with orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging. Compared to those with cylindrical implants, patients with triangular implants were also more likely to RTD at 6 months (80% vs. 17%, P = .035). Conclusions Following SIJF, a small majority of service members were able to return to full active duty status by 6 months. Further studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of navigation and implant selection, as our retrospective review noted differences in outcomes based on these variables.
引用
收藏
页码:e668 / e673
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Contemporary Trends in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Utilization in the Medicare Population by Specialty [J].
Hersh, Andrew M. ;
Jimenez, Adrian E. ;
Pellot, Karolina I. ;
Gong, Jung Ho ;
Jiang, Kelly ;
Khalifeh, Jawad M. ;
Ahmed, A. Karim ;
Raad, Micheal ;
Veeravagu, Anand ;
Ratliff, John K. ;
Jain, Amit ;
Lubelski, Daniel ;
Bydon, Ali ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Theodore, Nicholas ;
Azad, Tej D. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (06) :1244-1250
[22]   Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ghaddaf, Abdullah A. ;
Alsharef, Jawaher F. ;
Alsharef, Noor K. ;
Alsaegh, Mawaddah H. ;
Alshaban, Raneem M. ;
Almutairi, Amal O. ;
Abualola, Amal H. ;
Alshehri, Mohammed S. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 67 (01) :E16-E26
[23]   Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion Revision: A Technique Guide [J].
Cognetti, Daniel J. ;
Jorgensen, Anton Y. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (02) :274-279
[24]   Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with Cylindrical Threaded Implants Using Intraoperative Stereotactic Navigation [J].
Rajpal, Sharad ;
Burneikiene, Sigita .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 :E1588-E1591
[25]   MINIMALLY INVASIVE SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION A Lateral Approach Using Triangular Titanium Implants and Navigation [J].
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Holton, Kenneth J. .
JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 10 (04) :411-422
[26]   Postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion [J].
Schoell, Kyle ;
Buser, Zorica ;
Jakoi, Andre ;
Pham, Martin ;
Patel, Neil N. ;
Hsieh, Patrick C. ;
Liu, John C. ;
Wang, Jeffrey C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (11) :1324-1332
[27]   Possible factors influencing on the effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion - a call for further research and discussion [J].
Randers, Engelke Marie ;
Gerdhem, Paul ;
Stuge, Britt ;
Diarbakerli, Elias ;
Nordsletten, Lars ;
Rohrl, Stephan M. ;
Kibsgard, Thomas Johan .
ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2025, 79
[28]   Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Xu, Kai ;
Li, Ya-Ling ;
Xiao, Song-Hua ;
Pan, Yong-Wei .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 53 (02)
[29]   Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion: current insights and a comprehensive literature review [J].
Apaydin, Aydin Sinan ;
Yurtluk, Mehmet Denizhan ;
Than, Khoi D. .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 54 (06) :1185-1191
[30]   One-year results of minimally invasive fusion surgery of the sacroiliac joint as an alternative treatment after failed endoscopic thermal coagulation [J].
Soliman, Osama ;
Pflugmacher, Robert ;
Koch, Ernst M. W. ;
Mohamed, Hesham ;
van der Beck, Susanne ;
Abdallah, Hany ;
Bornemann, Rahel .
TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2022, 30 (05) :1125-1138