Return to Duty in Military Service Members Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Cognetti, Daniel J. [1 ]
Anderson, Kevin D. [1 ]
Handcox, Jordan E. [2 ]
Jorgensen, Anton Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Antonio, TX 78234 USA
[2] UT Hlth San Antonio, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Ortho San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78209 USA
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; DYSFUNCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usad330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction As the utilization of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) continues to expand, a better understanding of postoperative outcomes is needed, particularly in young and active individuals. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of this procedure in an active duty military population by examining return-to-duty (RTD) rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of the electronic medical record from a tertiary military medical center was performed for active duty service members undergoing SIJF from January 2013 to January 2019. The primary outcome measured was RTD at 6 months, with active duty status at 1 year, last follow-up, and revision surgery as secondary outcomes. Demographic and surgical variables recorded included patient age, gender, military rank, utilization of navigation, and implant type. Results Sixteen service members met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 40.5 & PLUSMN; 6.7 years. The mean follow-up after surgery was 24 & PLUSMN; 15 months. Patients received either cylindrical (n = 6) or triangular (n = 10) implants placed with (n = 6) or without (n = 10) navigation. Within 6 months of surgery, 56% of patients were able to RTD. Patients undergoing navigation-assisted procedures were significantly more likely to RTD at 6 months (100% vs. 30%, P = .011) compared to those undergoing surgery performed with orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging. Compared to those with cylindrical implants, patients with triangular implants were also more likely to RTD at 6 months (80% vs. 17%, P = .035). Conclusions Following SIJF, a small majority of service members were able to return to full active duty status by 6 months. Further studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of navigation and implant selection, as our retrospective review noted differences in outcomes based on these variables.
引用
收藏
页码:e668 / e673
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Garfin, Steven R.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 34 (08) : 600 - 601
  • [2] Sacroiliac dysfunction and minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion
    Fleming, Jacob W.
    Pan, Tommy
    Abubakar, Mohammed
    Shonnard, Matthew
    Radlicz, Chris
    Beall, Douglas P.
    TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 27 (03)
  • [3] Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review
    Chang, Eva
    Rains, Caroline
    Ali, Rania
    Wines, Roberta C.
    Kahwati, Leila C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (08) : 1240 - 1253
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence
    Martin, Christopher T.
    Haase, Lucas
    Lender, Paul A.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 : S20 - S29
  • [5] Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with allograft using a posterior approach
    Moghim, Robert
    Bovinet, Chris
    Jin, Max Y.
    Edwards, Katie
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [6] Ethnic Differences in Western and Asian Sacroiliac Joint Anatomy for Surgical Planning of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Wu, Christopher
    Liu, Yu-Cheng
    Koga, Hiroaki
    Lee, Ching-Yu
    Wang, Po-Yao
    Cher, Daniel
    Reckling, W. Carlton
    Huang, Tsung-Jen
    Wu, Meng-Huang
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Stabilization
    Novak, V
    Wanek, T.
    Hrabalek, L.
    Stejskal, P.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2021, 88 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [8] Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results
    Hermans, Sem M. M.
    Knoef, Rob J. H.
    Schuermans, Valerie N. E.
    Schotanus, Martijn G. M.
    Nellensteijn, Jorm M.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    Curfs, Inez
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [9] The Safety Profile of Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Shamrock, Alan Gregory
    Patel, Anand
    Alam, Milad
    Shamrock, Keith Hayden
    Al Maaieh, Motasem
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (08) : 874 - 880
  • [10] Propensity-matched Analysis of 1062 Patients Following Minimally Invasive Versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Ballatori, Alexander M.
    Shahrestani, Shane
    Chen, Xiao T.
    Ton, Andy
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Buser, Zorica
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (08): : E477 - E482