Drivers and barriers on implementing XR technologies in the construction industry in Turkey

被引:2
|
作者
Seyman-Guray, Tayibe [1 ]
Kismet, Burcu [2 ]
机构
[1] Fenerbahce Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Beykoz Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Extended reality (XR); virtual reality (VR); augmented reality (AR); construction industry; trend analysis; AUGMENTED REALITY; DELAY FACTORS; BIM;
D O I
10.1080/15623599.2023.2239498
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study presents drivers and barriers on construction industry extended reality (XR) implementations in Turkey. It aims to investigate the current state and future directions of XR opportunities for architecture offices and construction companies in a developing country. A quantitative approach was employed which involves conducting a survey, performing statistical analyses, and verification of the hypotheses. The data were analyzed by SPSS and Excel using the frequency, mean score, standard deviation (SD), and one sample t-test. Thirty-three different companies participated in the survey with a return rate of 56.89%. The results were considered statistically significant since all the p-values were below 0.05. The findings revealed that even though 60% of the companies are not using XR, 60% companies have near future plans on implementing them. According to the results, XR was considered as beneficial and highly motivating for the near future, yet it needs to be widespread for companies to keep themselves abreast of information and communication technology trends. Finally, by considering the findings obtained from the results this study reaches a classification of drivers as 'increased efficiency: time-cost-quality' and 'increased communication and coordination' while barriers as 'technical limitations', 'high costs', and 'unqualified professional'.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 974
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stakeholder perceptions of the benefits and barriers of implementing environmental management systems in the Maldivian construction industry
    Rasheed, Aminath S.
    Booth, Colin A.
    Horry, Rosemary E.
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 38 (04) : 2821 - 2850
  • [32] STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTIONS OF THE BENEFITS AND BARRIERS OF IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN THE NIGERIAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
    Owolana, Victoria O.
    Booth, Colin A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 24 (02) : 79 - 89
  • [33] Urban sustainability transition in Turkey: drivers and barriers
    Kadirbeyoglu, Zeynep
    Kutlu, Rabia
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT, 2024, 45 (02): : 348 - 368
  • [34] Barriers of Implementing Modern Methods of Construction
    Rahman, M. Motiar
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 30 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [35] Construction professionals’ perspectives on drivers and barriers of sustainable construction
    Serik Tokbolat
    Ferhat Karaca
    Serdar Durdyev
    Rajnish Kaur Calay
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 4361 - 4378
  • [36] Construction professionals' perspectives on drivers and barriers of sustainable construction
    Tokbolat, Serik
    Karaca, Ferhat
    Durdyev, Serdar
    Calay, Rajnish Kaur
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (05) : 4361 - 4378
  • [37] THE CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY - TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY
    IVANOVA, E
    METALLURGIST, 1993, 37 (11-12) : 197 - 199
  • [38] Drivers and barriers to the implementation of biogas technologies in Bangladesh
    Hasan, A. S. M. Monjurul
    Kabir, Md Ahsan
    Hoq, Md Tanbhir
    Johansson, Maria T.
    Thollander, Patrik
    BIOFUELS-UK, 2022, 13 (05): : 643 - 655
  • [39] MODELS OF IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTO INDUSTRY
    Walasik, Marzena
    Poteralska, Beata
    11TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2020, 2020, : 131 - 138
  • [40] BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTING LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES
    Gillingham, Kenneth
    Sweeney, James
    CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2012, 3 (04)