Heterogeneity of Glycolytic Phenotype Determined by 18F-FDG PET/CT Using Coefficient of Variation in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Pellegrino, Sara [1 ]
Fonti, Rosa [1 ]
Torbati, Armin Hakkak Moghadam [1 ]
Bologna, Roberto [1 ]
Morra, Rocco [2 ]
Damiano, Vincenzo [2 ]
Matano, Elide [2 ]
De Placido, Sabino [2 ]
Del Vecchio, Silvana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Clin Med & Surg, I-80131 Naples, Italy
关键词
Coefficient of Variation; F-18-FDG PET; CT; heterogeneity; Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Metabolic Tumor Volume; prognosis; LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; PARAMETERS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13142448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We investigated the role of Coefficient of Variation (CoV), a first-order texture parameter derived from F-18-FDG PET/CT, in the prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. Eighty-four patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT before therapy were retrospectively studied. SUVmax, SUVmean, CoV, total Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTVTOT) and whole-body Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG(WB)) were determined by an automated contouring program (SUV threshold at 2.5). We analyzed 194 lesions: primary tumors (n = 84), regional (n = 48) and non-regional (n = 17) lymph nodes and metastases in liver (n = 9), bone (n = 23) and other sites (n = 13); average CoVs were 0.36 & PLUSMN; 0.13, 0.36 & PLUSMN; 0.14, 0.42 & PLUSMN; 0.18, 0.30 & PLUSMN; 0.14, 0.37 & PLUSMN; 0.17, 0.34 & PLUSMN; 0.13, respectively. No significant differences were found between the CoV values among the different lesion categories. Survival analysis included age, gender, histology, stage, MTVTOT, TLG(WB) and imaging parameters derived from primary tumors. At univariate analysis, CoV (p = 0.0184), MTVTOT (p = 0.0050), TLG(WB) (p = 0.0108) and stage (p = 0.0041) predicted Overall Survival (OS). At multivariate analysis, age, CoV, MTVTOT and stage were retained in the model (p = 0.0001). Patients with CoV > 0.38 had significantly better OS than those with CoV & LE; 0.38 (p = 0.0143). Patients with MTVTOT & LE; 89.5 mL had higher OS than those with MTVTOT > 89.5 mL (p = 0.0063). Combining CoV and MTVTOT, patients with CoV & LE; 0.38 and MTVTOT > 89.5 mL had the worst prognosis. CoV, by reflecting the heterogeneity of glycolytic phenotype, can predict clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictive value of SUVmax measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer
    Qiang, Guangliang
    Xu, Rui
    Yan, Jue
    Yu, Qiduo
    Xiao, Fei
    Song, Zhiyi
    Tian, Yanchu
    Shi, Bin
    Liang, Chaoyang
    Guo, Yongqing
    Liu, Deruo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (02): : 3353 - 3361
  • [22] New insight on the correlation of metabolic status on 18F-FDG PET/CT with immune marker expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Wang, Yang
    Zhao, Ning
    Wu, Zhanbo
    Pan, Na
    Shen, Xuejie
    Liu, Ting
    Wei, Feng
    You, Jian
    Xu, Wengui
    Ren, Xiubao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (05) : 1127 - 1136
  • [23] Chemotherapy response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
    van der Heijden, Henricus F. M.
    Visser, Eric P.
    Hermsen, Rick
    van Hoorn, Bas A.
    Timmer-Bonte, Johanna N. H.
    Willemsen, Antoon T.
    Pruim, Jan
    Corstens, Frans H. M.
    Krabbe, Paul F. M.
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (10) : 1592 - 1598
  • [24] Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MDCT for staging/restaging of non-small cell lung cancer
    Sobic-Saranovic, D.
    Petrusic, I.
    Artiko, V.
    Pavlovic, S.
    Subotic, D.
    Saranovic, D.
    Nagorni-Obradovic, L.
    Petrovic, N.
    Todorovic-Tirnanic, M.
    Odalovic, S.
    Grozdic-Milojevic, I.
    Stoiljkovic, M.
    Obradovic, V.
    NEOPLASMA, 2015, 62 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [25] Visual Versus Quantitative Assessment of Intratumor 18F-FDG PET Uptake Heterogeneity: Prognostic Value in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Tixier, Florent
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Valla, Clemence
    Fleury, Vincent
    Lamour, Corinne
    Ezzouhri, Safaa
    Ingrand, Pierre
    Perdrisot, Remy
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    Le Rest, Catherine Cheze
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (08) : 1235 - 1241
  • [26] Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Erlotinib: Heterogeneity of 18F-FDG Uptake at PET-Association with Treatment Response and Prognosis
    Cook, Gary J. R.
    O'Brien, Mary E.
    Siddique, Muhammad
    Chicklore, Sugama
    Loi, Hoi Y.
    Sharma, Bhupinder
    Punwani, Ravi
    Bassett, Paul
    Goh, Vicky
    Chua, Sue
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (03) : 883 - 893
  • [27] Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression Level in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics and Clinicopathological Characteristics
    Li, Jihui
    Ge, Shushan
    Sang, Shibiao
    Hu, Chunhong
    Deng, Shengming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [28] Investigating the histopathologic correlates of 18F-FDG PET heterogeneity in non-small-cell lung cancer
    Bashir, Usman
    Foot, Oliver
    Wise, Olga
    Siddique, Muhammad M.
    Mclean, Emma
    Bille, Andrea
    Goh, Vicky
    Cook, Gary J.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 39 (12) : 1197 - 1206
  • [29] Coefficient of variation and texture analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT images for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma
    Pellegrino, Sara
    Origlia, Davide
    Di Donna, Erica
    Lamagna, Martina
    Della Pepa, Roberta
    Pane, Fabrizio
    Del Vecchio, Silvana
    Fonti, Rosa
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 103 (09) : 3713 - 3721
  • [30] Segmentation in Non-Small Cell Lung Tumors Using 18F-FDG PET/CT Tips and Rules
    Jimenez Londono, German Andres
    Perez-Beteta, Julian
    Bosque, Jesus J.
    Honguero-Martinez, Antonio Fancisco
    Garcia Vicente, Ana Maria
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (11) : E477 - E482