Substrate Mapping Alters Ventricular Tachycardia Inducibility

Background:Initiation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) by programmed electrical stimulation (PES) has an important role to allow mapping and assess ablation end points. We hypothesized that substrate mapping may alter VT inducibility by mechanical bumping of critical sites. Methods:Subjects with left ventricular scar-related VT that was inducible by PES who were undergoing ablation were included. PES was repeated after substrate mapping (Group I) or after time under sedation/anesthesia during which additional imaging and transeptal puncture were performed without substrate mapping (Group II). The response to the second PES was categorized as type I if the same VT was induced, type II if a different VT was induced, and type III if VT was not inducible. Results:Twenty-eight patients (median age 66 years, 61% ischemic cardiomyopathy), 14 in Group I and 14 in Group II, were included. Age, time between initial and second PES, type of cardiomyopathy, ejection fraction, and anesthesia methods were not different between the 2 groups. Initial VT cycle length, however, was shorter in Group I (305 millisecond [range, 235-600] versus 350 millisecond [range, 235-600], P=0.016). Also, Group I required more extrastimuli to induce VT in PES 1 (2 [1-4] versus 2 [1-3], P=0.022). In Group I, following substrate mapping, the second PES induced the same VT in 3 patients (21%), a different VT in 9 (64%), and no VT in 2 (14%) patients. In contrast, in Group II the same VT was induced in 10 (71%) patients, a different VT in 3 (21%) and no VT in 1 (7%) patient (P=0.017). Conclusions:Mechanical effects of substrate mapping commonly alter inducibility of VT. This has important implications for catheter ablation procedure planning and acute assessment of outcome and can potentially account for some recurrent VTs that are not recognized at the time of the procedure.