Unpacking equity. Educational equity in secondary analyses of international large-scale assessments: A systematic review

被引:4
作者
Appels, Lies [1 ,2 ]
De Maeyer, Sven [1 ]
Faddar, Jerich [1 ,3 ]
Van Petegem, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Training & Educ Sci, Sint Jacobstr 2, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Sint Jacobstr 2, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Free Univ Brussels, Dept Educ Sci, VUB Main Campus Etterbeek Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Educational equity; Conceptualization; Operationalization; International large-scale assessments; Systematic review; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; QUALITY; SCHOOLS; INEQUALITY; TIMSS; PERFORMANCE; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100494
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The discourse of educational equity has captured public imagination and become an entrenched policy value. In the attendant struggle to improve educational equity, governments draw inspi-ration from analyses based on data from highly standardized, international large-scale assess-ments. As these analyses are used as a lever for policy formulation, it is important to understand how this concept of equity is appropriated. Lacking a synthesis of how equity is conceptualized and operationalized in this body of research, the current paper seeks to fill that gap by presenting a systematic review. Our analysis incorporates an identification of operational patterns and an exploration regarding the linguistic elements for defining equity. We chart the theoretical and methodological diversity among interpretations of equity, as clustered into five major research approaches. In light of these results, benefits and limitations of the concept's complexity are discussed and implications for research are forwarded.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation
    Addey, Camilla
    Sellar, Sam
    Steiner-Khamsi, Gita
    Lingard, Bob
    Verger, Antoni
    [J]. COMPARE-A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, 2017, 47 (03) : 434 - 452
  • [2] A cross-country panel approach to exploring the determinants of educational equity through PISA data
    Agasisti, Tommaso
    Longobardi, Sergio
    Regoli, Andrea
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2017, 51 (03) : 1243 - 1260
  • [3] ALEXANDER PA, 1991, REV EDUC RES, V61, P315, DOI 10.3102/00346543061003315
  • [4] Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews
    Alexander, Patricia A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 90 (01) : 6 - 23
  • [5] Measuring the progress of equality of educational opportunity in absence of cardinal comparability
    Anderson, Gordon
    Pittau, Maria Grazia
    Zelli, Roberto
    [J]. METRON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2020, 78 (02): : 155 - 174
  • [6] The informed choice: mathematics textbook assessment in light of educational freedom, effectiveness, and improvement in primary education
    Bellens, Kim
    Van den Noortgate, Wim
    Van Damme, Jan
    [J]. SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, 2020, 31 (02) : 192 - 211
  • [7] Instructional quality: catalyst or pitfall in educational systems' aim for high achievement and equity? An answer based on multilevel SEM analyses of TIMSS 2015 data in Flanders (Belgium), Germany, and Norway
    Bellens, Kim
    Van Damme, Jan
    Van Den Noortgate, Wim
    Wendt, Heike
    Nilsen, Trude
    [J]. LARGE-SCALE ASSESSMENTS IN EDUCATION, 2019, 7 (1)
  • [8] School Segregation and Its Effects on Educational Equality and Efficiency in 16 OECD Comprehensive School Systems
    Benito, Ricard
    Angel Alegre, Miquel
    Gonzalez-Balletbo, Isaac
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW, 2014, 58 (01) : 104 - 134
  • [9] Berne R., 1999, Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives, P7
  • [10] Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education
    Biesta, Gert
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) : 33 - 46