Impact of COVID-19 policies on perceptions of loneliness in people aged 75 years and over in the cognitive function and aging study (CFAS II)

被引:3
作者
Richardson, Connor D. [1 ]
Roscoe, Hannah [2 ]
Green, Emma [3 ]
Brooks, Racheal [3 ]
Barnes, Linda [3 ]
Matthews, Fiona E. [1 ]
Brayne, Carol [3 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Biomed Res Bldg,Campus Ageing & Vitality, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[2] St Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, St Helens, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Strangeways Res Lab, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, England
基金
英国科研创新办公室; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19; Coronavirus; Epidemiology; Loneliness; SOCIAL-ISOLATION; OLDER-PEOPLE; MENTAL-HEALTH; ADULTS; DEPRESSION; LOCKDOWN; RISK; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.18099
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated social distancing measures have profoundly impacted society and social contact patterns, with older people disproportionately affected. Concerns have been raised about a resulting pandemic of loneliness in older people, although the current evidence is mixed. This study provides a unique perspective on the prevalence of loneliness in a population cohort of older people before the pandemic, followed up after the introduction of social restrictions. Methods: Data analysis was conducted using Wave 3 of the longitudinal Cognitive Function and Aging Study II (2018-2019) and a sub-study focusing on experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). The sample comprised 379 adults aged over 75 living in Cambridge, Newcastle, and Nottingham. Multivariable binary logistic regression was conducted to identify correlates of prevalent loneliness, adjusted for confounding covariates, during the pandemic. The prevalence of loneliness during the pandemic was compared to loneliness in 2018-2019. Results: Prevalence of loneliness in this sample during the pandemic was 25.1% (95% CI 20.9%-29.7%) compared to 17.2% (95% CI 13.7%-21.3%) in 2018-2019 (chi(2) = 14.1, p < 0.01). Variables associated with increased odds of prevalent loneliness included: prior loneliness, living alone, female gender, living in an area of higher deprivation, frequent pre-pandemic social contact at community groups, and separation from family during the pandemic, adjusted for age and sex. Weekly technology-mediated contact using telephone or video calls was associated with lower odds of loneliness. Conclusions: COVID-19 recovery plans should address loneliness in older people. Target groups should include those who have previously been lonely, people who live alone, those living in deprived areas, and those who had previously been socially active through community groups.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 473
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Age UK, 2018, ALL LON PEOPL LONL L
[2]   COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly [J].
Armitage, Richard ;
Nellums, Laura B. .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 5 (05) :E256-E256
[3]  
Brayne C, 1998, PSYCHOL MED, V28, P319
[4]   Older people and COVID-19: Isolation, risk and ageism [J].
Brooke, Joanne ;
Jackson, Debra .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (13-14) :2044-2046
[5]   Older people's early experience of household isolation and social distancing during COVID-19 [J].
Brooke, Joanne ;
Clark, Maria .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (21-22) :4387-4402
[6]   Life in lockdown: a telephone survey to investigate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on the lives of older people (≥75 years) [J].
Brown, Lesley ;
Mossabir, Rahena ;
Harrison, Nicola ;
Brundle, Caroline ;
Smith, Jane ;
Clegg, Andrew .
AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50 (02) :341-346
[7]  
Canadian Longitudinal Study of Ageing, 2021, CAN LONG STUD AG COV
[8]  
Champs Intelligence and Evidence Service, 2020, DIR IND IMP COVID 19
[9]   A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies [J].
Chatfield, MD ;
Brayne, CE ;
Matthews, FE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (01) :13-19
[10]  
de JongGierveld., 1998, REV CLIN GERONTOL, V8, P73, DOI [10.1017/s0959259898008090, DOI 10.1017/S0959259898008090]