Exploring the Context-Sensitivity of Collective Action Motivations and the Mobilizing Role of Social Media: A Comparative Interview Study With Activists in Germany and Turkey

被引:8
作者
Odag, Ozen [1 ]
Ulug, Ozden Melis [2 ,3 ]
Kanik, Betul [4 ]
Maganic, Mia Marina [5 ]
机构
[1] Touro Coll, Rupenhorn 5, D-14055 Berlin, Germany
[2] Clark Univ, Worcester, MA USA
[3] Univ Sussex, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[4] Hacettepe Univ, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Int Psychoanalyt Univ Berlin gGmbH, Berlin, Germany
关键词
collective action; social media; political participation; social identity; perceived efficacy; perceived injustice; cost-benefit analyses; Germany; Turkey; perceived risk; IDENTITY-MODEL; PARTICIPATION; EFFICACY; PROTESTS; OFFLINE; ONLINE; ENGAGEMENT; REPRESSION; NETWORK; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12836
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Western scholarship has underlined the relevance of social identity, perceived efficacy, emotions, and cost-benefit assessments as central catalysts of collective action. Little has been done to understand the context-sensitivity of these catalysts by means of cross-culturally comparative designs. The current study explores their context-sensitivity. It aims to find out whether existing opportunity structures in a democratic, nonrepressive country like Germany produce catalysts of collective action different from those produced in an autocratic, repressive country like Turkey. It also aims to understand the role of social media in mobilizing people in these two contexts. Semistandardized interviews with activists were carried out in both countries (n = 18 in Germany and n = 15 in Turkey) and analyzed by means of a cross-culturally comparative inductive coding procedure including initial and focused coding. Results show that collective action is related to different configurations of collective-action catalysts in the two countries. Solidarity concerns at the face of existential risks are more pronounced in Turkey, whereas political-change concerns are more important in Germany. The role of social media accordingly differs, adhering to the different activist goals. Theoretical implications for the role of context in studying collective action are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 255
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abanoz E., 2018, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, V17, P53
[2]   Cultures of conflict: Protests, violent repression, and community values [J].
Akkus, Birol ;
Postmes, Tom ;
Stroebe, Katherine ;
Baray, Gamze .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 59 (01) :49-65
[3]  
Akser, 2019, ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CO
[4]   Repression, spontaneity, and collective action: the 2013 Turkish Gezi protests [J].
Anisin, Alexei .
JOURNAL OF CIVIL SOCIETY, 2016, 12 (04) :411-429
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AP NEWS 1224
[6]   Resistance in Repressive Contexts: A Comprehensive Test of Psychological Predictors [J].
Ayanian, Arin H. ;
Tausch, Nicole ;
Acar, Yasemin Gulsum ;
Chayinska, Maria ;
Cheung, Wing-Yee ;
Lukyanova, Yulia .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 120 (04) :912-939
[7]   How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising [J].
Ayanian, Arin H. ;
Tausch, Nicole .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 55 (04) :700-721
[8]   Beyond Muslim identity: Opinion-based groups in the Gezi Park protest [J].
Baysu, Gulseli ;
Phalet, Karen .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2017, 20 (03) :350-366
[9]   A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers [J].
Becker, Julia C. ;
Tausch, Nicole .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 26 (01) :43-92
[10]   Social movement participation in the digital age - Predicting offline and online collective action [J].
Brunsting, S ;
Postmes, T .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (05) :525-554