Which political regimes foster entrepreneurship? An international examination

被引:10
作者
Goel, Rajeev K. [1 ,2 ]
Nelson, Michael A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Illinois State Univ, Dept Econ, Normal, IL 61790 USA
[2] Kiel Inst World Econ, Innovat & Int Competit, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[3] Univ Akron, Dept Econ, Akron, OH 44325 USA
关键词
Entrepreneurship; Nascent entrepreneurs; Established entrepreneurs; Democracy; Political regime; Presidential system; Military rule; Dictatorship; Monarchy; Corruption; PARLIAMENTARY; INSTITUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; MILITARY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-021-09907-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Whereas the influence of political regimes across various dimensions of economic and political performances has been considered by many scholars, the political regime-entrepreneurship relation has received relatively less attention. This paper uses data on a large sample of nations over two decades to examine the impact of different political regimes on nascent and established entrepreneurs. Results show that while the consideration of aggregate democracies boosts established entrepreneurs, it does not significantly affect nascent entrepreneurship. A unique finding is that border (spatial) democracies have positive spillovers on entrepreneurship in a nation and these spillovers hold across entrepreneurship types. Furthermore, the positive effects of political regimes are not confined to democracies and these influences vary across nascent and established entrepreneurs. Military regimes, however, consistently showed no significant impact on either form of entrepreneurship considered. Finally, the introduction of corruption, capturing institutional weakness, shows that greater corruption acts as an impediment to entrepreneurship, offsetting some of the positive spillovers from political structures.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 146
页数:21
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, DOI DOI 10.1177/104225879802200405
[2]   Political Regimes and Stock Market Performance in Africa [J].
Asongu, Simplice A. ;
Nwachukwu, Jacinta C. .
POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2018, 16 (03) :240-249
[3]   Necessity or opportunity? Government size, tax policy, corruption, and implications for entrepreneurship [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Belitski, Maksim ;
Chowdhury, Farzana ;
Desai, Sameeksha .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2022, 58 (04) :2025-2042
[4]   Democracy and Entrepreneurship [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Moog, Petra .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 46 (02) :368-392
[5]   Political institutions behind good governance [J].
Bartolini, David ;
Santolini, Raffaella .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2017, 41 (01) :68-85
[6]   Regime types and regime change: A new dataset on democracy, coups, and political institutions [J].
Bjornskov, Christian ;
Rode, Martin .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2020, 15 (02) :531-551
[7]   Democratic Electoral Systems around the world, 1946-2011 [J].
Bormann, Nils-Christian ;
Golder, Matt .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2013, 32 (02) :360-369
[8]  
Bosma N., 2020, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor News
[9]   Is it the gums, teeth or the bite? Effectiveness of dimensions of enforcement in curbing corruption [J].
Capasso, Salvatore ;
Goel, Rajeev K. ;
Saunoris, James W. .
ECONOMICS OF GOVERNANCE, 2019, 20 (04) :329-369
[10]  
Carey J.M., 2008, HDB NEW I EC, P91, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_6