The bottleneck and ceiling effects in quantized tracking control of heterogeneous multi-agent systems under DoS attacks

被引:8
作者
Feng, Shuai [1 ]
Ran, Maopeng [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Baoyong [1 ]
Xie, Lihua [4 ]
Xu, Shengyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Automat, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Automat Sci & Elect Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongguancun Lab, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Singapore 68000, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
NETWORKED CONTROL; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111424
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate tracking control of heterogeneous multi-agent systems under Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and state quantization. Dynamic quantized mechanisms are designed for inter-follower communication and leader-follower communication. Zooming-in and out factors, and data rates of both mechanisms for preventing quantizer saturation are provided. Our results show that by tuning the inter-follower quantized controller, one cannot improve the resilience beyond a level determined by the data rate of leader-follower quantized communication, i.e., the ceiling effect. Otherwise, overflow of followers' state quantizer can occur. On the other hand, if one selects a "large"data rate for leader-follower quantized communication, then the inter-follower quantized communication determines the resilience, and further increasing the data rate for leader-follower quantized communication cannot improve the resilience, i.e., the bottleneck effect. Simulation examples are provided to justify the results of our paper. (C) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Amin S, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5469, P31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00602-9_3
[2]   RQ-CEASE: A Resilient Quantized Collaborative Event-Triggered Average-Consensus Sampled-Data Framework Under Denial of Service Attack [J].
Amini, Amir ;
Asif, Amir ;
Mohammadi, Arash .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (11) :7027-7039
[3]   Risk-Sensitive Control Under Markov Modulated Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attack Strategies [J].
Befekadu, Getachew K. ;
Gupta, Vijay ;
Antsaklis, Panos J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2015, 60 (12) :3299-3304
[4]  
Bhowmick C, 2020, P AMER CONTR CONF, P4016, DOI [10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147499, 10.23919/acc45564.2020.9147499]
[5]   Real-Time Detection and Estimation of Denial of Service Attack in Connected Vehicle Systems [J].
Biron, Zoleikha Abdollahi ;
Dey, Satadru ;
Pisu, Pierluigi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (12) :3893-3902
[6]  
Bullo F., 2020, Lectures on network systems
[7]  
Califano C., 2023, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
[8]  
Cardenas A., 2009, POWER ENERGY ENG C, P1
[9]   Analysis of Stochastic Switched Systems With Application to Networked Control Under Jamming Attacks [J].
Cetinkaya, Ahmet ;
Ishii, Hideaki ;
Hayakawa, Tomohisa .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2019, 64 (05) :2013-2028
[10]   Input-to-State Stabilizing Control Under Denial-of-Service [J].
De Persis, Claudio ;
Tesi, Pietro .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2015, 60 (11) :2930-2944