Prophylactic Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in High-risk Patients Undergoing Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

被引:2
|
作者
Vidya, Raghavan [1 ]
Khosla, Muskaan [1 ]
Baek, Kim [2 ]
Vinayagam, R. [3 ]
Thekkinkattil, Dinesh [4 ]
Laws, Siobhan [5 ]
Douvetzemis, Stergios [6 ]
Sircar, Tapan [1 ]
Mullapudi, Amulya [1 ]
Murphy, John [7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, England
[2] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds, England
[3] Clatterbridge Hosp, Wirral Breast Ctr, Birkenhead, Wirral, England
[4] Lincoln Cty Hosp, Lincoln Breast Unit, Lincoln, England
[5] Royal Hampshire Cty Hosp, Winchester, England
[6] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[7] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Nightingale Breast Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
PREVENTION; INCISION; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000005488
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has emerged as an adjunct to reduce wound complication rates in many surgical domains. This study investigated the prophylactic use of PICO NPWT in high-risk patients undergoing oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery.Methods:This was a prospective multicenter national audit. The findings were compared against Association of Breast Surgery/British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (ABS/BAPRAS) Oncoplastic Guidelines for best practice.Results:Data from 267 patients were included from seven centers. All patients had at least one high-risk factor for postoperative wound complications, whereas 78 patients (29.2%) had more than one. Thirty-six patients (13.5%) developed postoperative wound complications. An estimated 16 (6%) developed skin flap necrosis, wound dehiscence occurred in 13 patients (4.9%), and 15 patients (5.6%) developed postoperative wound infection. Eleven patients (4.1%) required further surgery due to wound complications. In total, 158 patients underwent mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction. Postoperative wound complication rate was comparable in this subgroup (n = 22; 13.9%). Implant loss rate was 3.8%, which was within the 5% target mentioned in the ABS/BAPRAS guidelines. The estimated total cost saving was US $105,600 (84,613) pound and US $395.50 (316.90) pound per patient. Wound infection rate (5.6%) was much lower than the 25% reported by both iBRA study and National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit.Conclusions:Our study suggests that prophylactic use of NPWT in oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery results in low rates of wound-related complications with associated healthcare cost benefits in patients with high-risk factors for wound-related complications. However, a prospective randomized control trial is required.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oncoplastic breast surgery: the role of negative pressure wound therapy
    Iqbal, Fahad M.
    Reid, Jeremy P.
    Vidya, Raghavan
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2020, 29 (12) : 777 - 780
  • [2] Is Using Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Reconstructive and Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Helpful in Reducing Skin Necrosis?
    Al-Ishaq, Zaid
    Rahman, Ehsanur
    Salem, Fathi
    Taj, Saima
    Mula-Hussain, Layth
    Mylvaganam, Senthurun
    Vidya, Raghavan
    Matey, Pilar
    Sircar, Tapan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [3] The negative pressure therapy with PICO as a prevention of surgical site infection in high-risk patients undergoing breast surgery
    Fogacci, Tommaso
    Cattin, Federico
    Semprini, Gloria
    Frisoni, Gianluca
    Fabiocchi, Luca
    Samorani, Domenico
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (05): : 1071 - 1073
  • [4] The use of negative pressure wound therapy in the primary setting for high-risk head and neck surgery
    O'Malley, Quinn F.
    Sims, John R.
    Sandler, Mykayla L.
    Spitzer, Hannah
    Urken, Mark L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 41 (04)
  • [5] The use of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy on high-risk patients with breast cancer after mastectomy
    Esen, Ebru
    Morkavuk, Sevket Baris
    Turan, Mujdat
    Akyuz, Simay
    Guler, Sumeyra
    Akgul, Gokhan Giray
    Bahcecioglu, Ibrahim Burak
    Gulcelik, Mehmet Ali
    Yilmaz, Kerim Bora
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 48 (01) : 185 - 192
  • [6] Effect of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for High-Risk Wounds in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kacmaz, Hatice Yuceler
    Baser, Muruvvet
    Sozuer, Erdogan Mutevelli
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2022, 35 (11) : 597 - 603
  • [7] Effect of Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Postcesarean Infections and Wound Complications for High-Risk Patients
    Swift, Sara H.
    Zimmerman, M. Bridget
    Hardy-Fairbanks, Abbey J.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 60 (5-6) : 211 - 218
  • [8] INCISIONAL NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR HIGH-RISK WOUNDS
    Horch, Raymund E.
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2015, 24 (04) : 21 - 28
  • [9] The Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Incisions in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cagney, David
    Simmons, Lydia
    O'Leary, Donal Peter
    Corrigan, Mark
    Kelly, Louise
    O'Sullivan, M. J.
    Liew, Aaron
    Redmond, Henry Paul
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (05) : 1526 - 1537
  • [10] Prophylactic Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Cesarean Delivery
    Echebiri, Nelson C.
    McDoom, M. Maya
    Aalto, Meaghan M.
    Fauntleroy, Jessie
    Nagappan, Nagammai
    Barnabei, Vanessa M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (02): : 299 - 307