Audit committee-auditor interlocking and audit fees: evidence from China

被引:0
作者
Xiang, Rui [1 ]
Lin, Rongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Dept Accounting & Finance, 24 South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
关键词
Audit committee-auditor interlocking; audit fees; external governance environment; audit quality; M42; G30; M40; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FINANCIAL FRAUD; DIRECTORS; IMPACT; POWER; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2023.2288046
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of audit committee-auditor interlocking on the audit fees in a sample of listed Chinese companies from 2005 to 2018. It is found that audit committee-auditor interlocking significantly increases the audit fees, and this positive relationship is more significant in better external governance environments, as measured by the marketization level, legal environment, regulatory intensity, and analyst attention. Further analyses show that the interlocking has a greater positive impact on audit fees when it is caused by the audit committee chair, audit partner, and industry specialist auditor, and when the interlocking companies are operating in the same industry. The interlocking relationship also increases audit quality and reduces the stock price crash risk in which the audit fees play the mediating role. The results suggest that it's the reputation mechanism that motivates audit committee directors and auditors in interlocking relationships to increase audit fees and audit quality. We provide practical implications for auditors, listed companies, investors, and regulators in aspects of increasing audit fees and audit quality, protecting investors' interests, and improving the external governance environments.
引用
收藏
页码:7669 / 7685
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   AUDIT FEES AND AUDIT QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL REGION [J].
Aljaaidi, Khaled Salmen ;
Bin Abidin, Shamharir ;
Hassan, Waddah Kamal .
AD-MINISTER, 2021, (38) :121-159
[22]   Female audit committee directorship and audit fees [J].
Sellami, Yosra Mnif ;
Cherif, Imen .
MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2020, 35 (03) :398-428
[23]   Multiple large ownership structure, audit committee activity and audit fees Evidence from the UK [J].
Adelopo, Ismail ;
Jallow, Kumba ;
Scott, Peter .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 13 (02) :100-+
[24]   Audit committee members' proximity to corporate headquarters and audit fees [J].
Firoozi, Maryam ;
Magnan, Michel .
MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2022, 37 (08) :1062-1090
[25]   Auditors' response to corporate fraud: evidence from audit fees and auditor turnover [J].
Lee, Eugenia Yujin ;
Ha, Wonsuk .
MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2021, 36 (03) :405-436
[26]   Effects of audit committee chair characteristics on auditor choice, audit fee and audit quality [J].
Azizkhani, Masoud ;
Hossain, Sarowar ;
Nguyen, Mai .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023, 63 (03) :3675-3707
[27]   Audit fees and audit adjustments: evidence from Welsh local authorities [J].
Baylis, Richard M. ;
Greenwood, Margaret J. .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 36 (05) :357-364
[28]   The impact of PCAOB international registration on audit quality and audit fees: Evidence from China [J].
Mohapatra, Partha S. ;
Elkins, Hamilton ;
Lobo, Gerald J. ;
Chi, Wuchun .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 41 (04)
[29]   Audit committee effectiveness and non-audit service fees: Evidence from UK family firms [J].
Al-Okaily, Jihad ;
BenYoussef, Nourhene .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2020, 41
[30]   Is Audit Committee Equity Compensation Related to Audit Fees?* [J].
Liu, Xinming ;
Lobo, Gerald J. ;
Yu, Hung-Chao .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (01) :740-769