Audit committee-auditor interlocking and audit fees: evidence from China

被引:0
作者
Xiang, Rui [1 ]
Lin, Rongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Dept Accounting & Finance, 24 South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
关键词
Audit committee-auditor interlocking; audit fees; external governance environment; audit quality; M42; G30; M40; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FINANCIAL FRAUD; DIRECTORS; IMPACT; POWER; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2023.2288046
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of audit committee-auditor interlocking on the audit fees in a sample of listed Chinese companies from 2005 to 2018. It is found that audit committee-auditor interlocking significantly increases the audit fees, and this positive relationship is more significant in better external governance environments, as measured by the marketization level, legal environment, regulatory intensity, and analyst attention. Further analyses show that the interlocking has a greater positive impact on audit fees when it is caused by the audit committee chair, audit partner, and industry specialist auditor, and when the interlocking companies are operating in the same industry. The interlocking relationship also increases audit quality and reduces the stock price crash risk in which the audit fees play the mediating role. The results suggest that it's the reputation mechanism that motivates audit committee directors and auditors in interlocking relationships to increase audit fees and audit quality. We provide practical implications for auditors, listed companies, investors, and regulators in aspects of increasing audit fees and audit quality, protecting investors' interests, and improving the external governance environments.
引用
收藏
页码:7669 / 7685
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Female audit committee members and their influence on audit fees [J].
Aldamen, Husam ;
Hollindale, Janice ;
Ziegelmayer, Jennifer L. .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2018, 58 (01) :57-89
[2]   Auditors' Fee Premiums and Low-Quality Internal Controls [J].
Bae, Gil S. ;
Choi, Seung U. K. ;
Lamoreaux, Phillip T. ;
Lee, Jae E. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (01) :586-620
[3]   Auditor Independence and Auditor Bargaining Power: Some Spanish Evidence Concerning Audit Error in the Going Concern Decision [J].
Barnes, Paul ;
Anton Renart, Marcos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2013, 17 (03) :265-287
[4]   Auditor's engagement risk and audit fees: The role of audit firm alumni [J].
Basioudis, Ilias G. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2007, 34 (9-10) :1393-1422
[5]  
Beattie V., 1998, British Accounting Review, V30, P261, DOI DOI 10.1006/BARE.1997.0070
[6]   Who's Really in Charge? Audit Committee versus CFO Power and Audit Fees [J].
Beck, Matthew J. ;
Mauldin, Elaine G. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2014, 89 (06) :2057-2085
[7]  
Carcello JV, 2002, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V19, P365, DOI 10.1506/CHWK-GMQ0-MLKE-K03V
[8]   Audit Committee Director-Auditor Interlocking and Perceptions of Earnings Quality [J].
Chen, Jeng-Fang ;
Chou, Yan-Yu ;
Duh, Rong-Ruey ;
Lin, Yu-Chen .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (04) :41-70
[9]   Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence [J].
Choi, Jong-Hag ;
Kim, Jeong-Bon ;
Liu, Xiaohong ;
Simunic, Dan A. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2008, 25 (01) :55-+
[10]   Affiliated Former Partners on the Audit Committee: Influence on the Auditor-Client Relationship and Audit Quality [J].
Christensen, Brant E. ;
Omer, Thomas C. ;
Shelley, Marjorie K. ;
Wong, Paul A. .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2019, 38 (03) :95-119