Bias correcting discharge simulations from the GEOGloWS global hydrologic model

被引:10
作者
Hales, Riley C. [1 ]
Williams, Gustavious P. [1 ]
Nelson, E. James [1 ]
Sowby, Robert B. [1 ]
Ames, Daniel P. [1 ]
Lozano, Jorge Luis Sanchez [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Civil & Construct Engn, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
GEOGloWS; SABER; Hydrologic Modeling; Bias Correction; Watershed Classification; Validation; STREAMFLOW; CLASSIFICATION; WATERSHEDS; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130279
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Group on Earth Observations (GEO) Global Water Sustainability (GEOGloWS) hydrologic model provides global river discharge hindcasts and daily forecasts at approximately one million subbasins worldwide. The model is meant to sustainably provide discharge data during emergency situations and to underdeveloped countries which do not have sufficient local capacity. The primary model error is biased flow magnitudes which reduce the usefulness of the results. We applied a revised implementation of the SABER bias correction method to correct GEOGloWS model results. SABER uses a combination of watershed clustering with machine learning, geospatial analysis, and statistics to generalize bias patterns in gauged basins so they can also be applied to ungauged basins. We validated the bias corrected data created using the improved SABER method at 12,965 gauges globally and showed that this method reduced the mean error at 90% of gauges. We present an analysis of the improved SABER method using several metrics including mean error, root mean squared error, and Kling Gupta Efficiency. We found that the GEOGloWS model is usually biased high but our results indicate a reduction in the bias of the GEOGloWS model worldwide. We evaluate the varied performance of the bias correction procedure and significance of the improvements which vary based on stream order the watershed classifications derived in our analysis. We provide guidance on the use of bias corrected global data to local scale applications and discuss implications for the GEOGloWS model in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
[61]  
Satopaa V., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCS Workshops), P166, DOI 10.1109/ICDCSW.2011.20
[62]  
Sculley D., 2010, P 19 INT C WORLD WID, P1177, DOI 10.1145/1772690.1772862
[63]   Advances in variable selection methods II: Effect of variable selection method on classification of hydrologically similar watersheds in three Mid-Atlantic ecoregions [J].
Ssegane, H. ;
Tollner, E. W. ;
Mohamoud, Y. M. ;
Rasmussen, T. C. ;
Dowd, J. F. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 438 :26-38
[64]   Probabilistic principal component analysis [J].
Tipping, ME ;
Bishop, CM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1999, 61 :611-622
[65]   Verification of two hydrological models for real-time flood forecasting in the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH) region [J].
Tsering, Karma ;
Shrestha, Manish ;
Shakya, Kiran ;
Bajracharya, Birendra ;
Matin, Mir ;
Lozano, Jorge Luis Sanchez ;
Nelson, Jim ;
Wangchuk, Tandin ;
Parajuli, Binod ;
Bhuyan, Md Arifuzzaman .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 110 (03) :1821-1845
[66]  
USGS, 2022, USGS WATER DATA NATI
[67]   Statistical modelling of measurement error in wet chemistry soil data [J].
van Leeuwen, Cynthia C. E. ;
Mulder, Vera L. ;
Batjes, Niels H. ;
Heuvelink, Gerard B. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2022, 73 (01)
[68]  
Wang KM, 1997, ANN STAT, V25, P1251
[69]  
World Bank Group, 2020, The Global Reservoir and Dam Database GRanD
[70]  
Zanaga Daniele, 2021, Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.5571935