Multifidelity Surrogate Modeling for Time-Series Outputs

被引:1
作者
Kerleguer, Baptiste [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] DIF, CEA, DAM, F-91128 Arpajon, France
[2] Ecole Polytech, Inst Polytech Paris, Ctr Math Appl, Palaiseau 91128, France
关键词
Gaussian processes; time-series outputs; tensorized covariance; dimension reduction; CROSS-VALIDATION; BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1137/20M1386694
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This paper considers the surrogate modeling of a complex numerical code in a multifidelity frame-work when the code output is a time series and two code levels are available: a high-fidelity and expensive code level and a low-fidelity and cheap code level. The goal is to emulate a fast-running approximation of the high-fidelity code level. An original Gaussian process regression method is proposed that uses an experimental design of the low-and high-fidelity code levels. The code output is expanded on a basis built from the experimental design. The first coefficients of the expansion of the code output are processed by a cokriging approach. The last coefficients are processed by a kriging approach with covariance tensorization. The resulting surrogate model provides a predictive mean and a predictive variance of the output of the high-fidelity code level. It is shown to have better performance in terms of prediction errors than standard dimension reduction techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 539
页数:26
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Application of reduced-order models based on PCA & Kriging for the development of digital twins of reacting flow applications
    Aversano, Gianmarco
    Bellemans, Aurelie
    Li, Zhiyi
    Coussement, Axel
    Gicquel, Olivier
    Parente, Alessandro
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 121 : 422 - 441
  • [2] Cross Validation and Maximum Likelihood estimations of hyper-parameters of Gaussian processes with model misspecification
    Bachoc, Francois
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2013, 66 : 55 - 69
  • [3] Gaussian process emulation of dynamic computer codes
    Conti, S.
    Gosling, J. P.
    Oakley, J. E.
    O'Hagan, A.
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2009, 96 (03) : 663 - 676
  • [4] Cutajar K, 2019, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1903.07320, 10.48550/arXiv.1903.07320, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1903.07320]
  • [5] DIACONIS P., 2005, Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc., V52, P1348
  • [6] CROSS VALIDATION OF KRIGING IN A UNIQUE NEIGHBORHOOD
    DUBRULE, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1983, 15 (06): : 687 - 699
  • [7] Dupuy D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V65
  • [8] Issues in Deciding Whether to Use Multifidelity Surrogates
    Fernandez-Godino, M. Giselle
    Park, Chanyoung
    Kim, Nam H.
    Haftka, Raphael T.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (05) : 2039 - 2054
  • [9] Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling
    Forrester, Alexander I. J.
    Sobester, Andras
    Keane, Andy J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 463 (2088): : 3251 - 3269
  • [10] Prediction and Computer Model Calibration Using Outputs From Multifidelity Simulators
    Goh, Joslin
    Bingham, Derek
    Holloway, James Paul
    Grosskopf, Michael J.
    Kuranz, Carolyn C.
    Rutter, Erica
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 2013, 55 (04) : 501 - 512