Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Feng, Shitao [1 ]
Li, Mingli [1 ]
Fei, Jiayue [1 ]
Dong, Anqin [1 ]
Zhang, Wenli [1 ]
Fu, Yanhua [1 ]
Zhao, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Geriatr, Affiliated Hosp 5, 3 Kang fu Qian St, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Meta-analysis; BARE-METAL STENTS; EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS; FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL REVASCULARIZATION; SURGERY; TRIAL; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1186/s13019-023-02101-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundShort-term and long-term comparative outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary artery (MVCA) or left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease are highly debated.GoalsWe performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the difference between PCI and CABG for the treatment of patients with MVCA or LMCA in long-term follow-up.MethodsLiteratures were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2021, including RCTs and observational studies (OSs). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 10 years follow-up, and the secondary outcomes included cardiac mortality, repeated revascularization, myocardial infarction, and stroke.ResultsA total of 5 RCTs reporting data from 3013 participants and 4 OSs of 5608 participants were included for analysis. There was no significant difference between PCI and CABG in all-cause mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.19]), whereas PCI was associated with higher cardiac mortality (OR 0.76 [95% CI 0.65 to 0.90]) and repeated revascularization rate comparing to CABG (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.08 to 2.89]; I-2 = 94.61%). The difference between PCI and CABG in repeated revascularization in either RCTs or OSs, in myocardial infarction in either RCTs or OSs were not significant. In OSs, stroke rate in PCI group was lower than those in CABG, but not in RCTs. There was a significant increase of stroke rate in CABG comparing to PCI (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.80]; I-2 = 0.00%). No significant difference between PCI and CABG in myocardial infarction was not observed (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.64 to 1.31]; I-2 = 57.84%).ConclusionEvidence from our study and prior studies suggested the superiority of CABG over PCI in improving 5- but not 10-year survival among patients with MVCA. In the contrast, there was no significant difference between CABG and PCI for treating patients with LMCA in either 5- or 10-year survival rate. More long-term trials are needed to better define differences of outcome between 2 techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Peng
    Zhou, Pengyu
    Sun, Yong
    Guo, Yilong
    Mai, Mingjie
    Zheng, Shaoyi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 10
  • [22] Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng Zhu
    Pengyu Zhou
    Yong Sun
    Yilong Guo
    Mingjie Mai
    Shaoyi Zheng
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 10
  • [23] Meta-Analysis Comparing 10-Year Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Stem or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Woodhead, Timothy
    Matthews, Connor Jack
    Blaxill, Jonathan Mark
    Greenwood, John Pierre
    Mozid, Abdul Moheet
    Rossington, Jennifer Ann
    Veerasamy, Murugapathy
    Wassef, Nancy
    Wheatcroft, Stephen Bentley
    Bulluck, Heerajnarain
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 174 : 189 - 191
  • [24] Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sharma, Sharan P.
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Khatra, Jaspreet
    Rosenfeld, Alan
    Lee, Juyong
    CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 35 (03)
  • [25] Meta-Analysis Comparing the Risk of Myocardial Infarction Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Lee, Pil Hyung
    Park, Hanbit
    Lee, Ji Sung
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (06): : 842 - 850
  • [26] Sex-Specific Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Jennifer Y.
    Tie, Emilia Nan
    Liew, Danny
    Duffy, Stephen J.
    Shaw, James
    Walton, Antony
    Chan, William
    Stub, Dion
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2022, 31 (05): : 658 - 665
  • [27] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease
    Munkholm-Larsen, Stine
    Yan, Tristan D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (10) : 2677 - 2679
  • [28] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Revascularization of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Park, Sangwoo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Park, Duk-Woo
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2023, 53 (03) : 113 - 133
  • [29] Multivessel disease: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting
    Munir, Muhammad S.
    Delaughter, Craig
    Ahmed, Amany H.
    Lee, Vei-Vei
    Elayda, MacArthur A.
    Wilson, James M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 40B - 40B
  • [30] Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Garg, Aakash
    Rout, Amit
    Raheja, Hitesh
    Hakeem, Hisham
    Sharma, Samin
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (03) : 427 - 433