Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: 2021 Update

被引:10
作者
Adams, Amy [1 ]
Adelfio, Anina [1 ]
Barnes, Brian [1 ]
Berlien, Ruth [1 ]
Branco, Danilo [1 ]
Coogan, Amanda [1 ]
Garson, Lauren [1 ]
Ramirez, Nycole [1 ]
Stansbury, Nicole [1 ]
Stewart, Jennifer [1 ]
Worman, Gillian [1 ]
Butler, Paula Jo [1 ]
Brown, Debby [1 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Clin Res Org ACRO, 601 New Jersey Ave NW 350, Washington, DC 20001 USA
关键词
Risk-Based Monitoring; Risk-Based Quality Management; Centralized Monitoring; Clinical Trial Quality; RBM; RBQM;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-022-00496-9
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical trial quality depends on ensuring participant safety and data integrity, which require careful management throughout the trial lifecycle, from protocol development to final data analysis and submission. Recent developments-including new regulatory requirements, emerging technologies, and trial decentralization-have increased adoption of risk-based monitoring (RBM) and its parent framework, risk-based quality management (RBQM) in clinical trials. The Association of Clinical Research Organizations (ACRO), recognizing the growing importance of these approaches, initiated an ongoing RBM/RBQM landscape survey project in 2019 to track adoption of the eight functional components of RBQM. Here we present results from the third annual survey, which included data from 4889 clinical trials ongoing in 2021. At least one RBQM component was implemented in 88% of trials in the 2021 survey, compared with 77% in 2020 and 53% in 2019. The most frequently implemented components in 2021 were initial and ongoing risk assessments (80 and 78% of trials, respectively). Only 7% of RBQM trials were Phase IV, while the proportions of Phase I-III trials ranged 27-36%. Small trials (< 300 participants) accounted for 60% of those implementing RBQM. The therapeutic areas with the largest number of RBQM trials were oncology (38%), neurology (10%), and infectious diseases (9%). The 2021 survey confirmed a pattern of increasing RBM/RBQM adoption seen in earlier surveys, with risk assessments, which have broad regulatory support, driving RBQM growth; however, one area requiring further development is implementation of centralized monitoring combined with reductions in source data verification (SDV) and source data review (SDR).
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 537
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [11] MHRA, 2022, RISK AD APPR CLIN TR
  • [12] Evaluating Source Data Verification as a Quality Control Measure in Clinical Trials
    Sheetz, Nicole
    Wilson, Brett
    Benedict, Joanne
    Huffman, Esther
    Lawton, Andy
    Travers, Mark
    Nadolny, Patrick
    Young, Stephen
    Given, Kyle
    Florin, Lawrence
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2014, 48 (06) : 671 - 680
  • [13] Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Increased Adoption Throughout 2020
    Stansbury, Nicole
    Barnes, Brian
    Adams, Amy
    Berlien, Ruth
    Branco, Danilo
    Brown, Debby
    Butler, Paula
    Garson, Lauren
    Jendrasek, Debra
    Manasco, Garrett
    Ramirez, Nycole
    Sanjuan, Nelly
    Worman, Gillian
    Adelfio, Anina
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2022, 56 (03) : 415 - 422
  • [14] The Food and Drug Administration, 2020, FDA GUID COND CLIN T
  • [15] Wong CH, 2019, BIOSTATISTICS, V20, P273, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069