Personalized breast cancer screening with selective addition of digital breast tomosynthesis through artificial intelligence

被引:0
作者
Dahlblom, Victor [1 ,2 ]
Tingberg, Anders [3 ,4 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [1 ,2 ]
Dustler, Magnus [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Physiol, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Med Radiat Phys, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Skane Univ Hosp, Radiat Phys, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
breast cancer screening; digital breast tomosynthesis; artificial intelligence; personalized screening; LESION CONSPICUOUSNESS; SYNTHETIC MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; TASK;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.10.S2.S22408
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Breast cancer screening is predominantly performed using digital mammography (DM), but digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has higher sensitivity. DBT demands more resources than DM, and it might be more feasible to reserve DBT for women with a clear benefit from the technique. We explore if artificial intelligence (AI) can select women who would benefit from DBT imaging. Approach: We used data from Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, where all women prospectively were examined with separately double read DM and DBT. We retrospectively analyzed DM examinations (n = 14768) with a breast cancer detection system and used the provided risk score (1 to 10) for risk stratification. We tested how different score thresholds for adding DBT to an initial DM affects the number of detected cancers, additional DBT examinations needed, detection rate, and false positives. Results: If using a threshold of 9.0, 25 (26%) more cancers would be detected compared to using DM alone. Of the 41 cancers only detected on DBT, 61% would be detected, with only 1797 (12%) of the women examined with both DM and DBT. The detection rate for the added DBT would be 14/1000 women, whereas the falsepositive recalls would be increased with 58 (21%). Conclusion: Using DBT only for selected high gain cases could be an alternative to complete DBT screening. AI can analyze initial DM images to identify high gain cases where DBT can be added during the same visit. There might be logistical challenges, and further studies in a prospective setting are necessary. (c) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. [DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S2.S22408]
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gur, David
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Gullien, Randi
    Hofvind, Solveig
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (03) : 489 - 496
  • [32] Artificial intelligence for the real world of breast screening
    Wallis, Matthew G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 144
  • [33] Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates
    Boroumand, Gilda
    Teberian, Ida
    Parker, Laurence
    Rao, Vijay M.
    Levin, David C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (05) : 1092 - 1096
  • [34] Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives
    Geras, Krzysztof J.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Moy, Linda
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (02) : 246 - 259
  • [35] Performance Metrics of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Based on Years Since a Prior Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Do, Daniel
    Mercaldo, Sarah
    Bahl, Manisha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (03)
  • [36] Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population
    Bonafede, Machaon M.
    Kalra, Vivek B.
    Miller, Jeffrey D.
    Fajardo, Laurie L.
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 7 : 53 - 63
  • [37] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: Is independent double reading still required?
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Hense, Hans-Werner
    Weyer-Elberich, Veronika
    Gerss, Joachim
    Heindel, Walter
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2024, 196 (08): : 834 - 842
  • [38] Are artificial intelligence systems useful in breast cancer screening programs?
    Diaz, O.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, A.
    Gubern-Merida, A.
    Marti, R.
    Chevalier, M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2021, 63 (03): : 236 - 244
  • [39] The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program
    Wang, Jing
    Xuan-Anh Phi
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    Daszczuk, Alicja M.
    Feenstra, Talitha L.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Vermeulen, Karin M.
    Buls, Nico
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Lu, Wenli
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (10) : 5437 - 5445
  • [40] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Improves Early Breast Cancer Detection and Survival in Taiwan
    Wu, Pei-Shan
    Hong, Yu-Ting
    Shen, Chiao-Hsuan
    Lee, Chao-Hsien
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024, 6 (06) : 601 - 609