Ethical use of artificial intelligence in health professions education: AMEE Guide No.158

被引:111
作者
Masters, Ken [1 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Med Educ & Informat Dept, Muscat, Oman
关键词
Ethics; artificial intelligence; medical education; health professions education; ChatGPT; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; ANALYTICS;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2023.2186203
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Health Professions Education (HPE) has benefitted from the advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and is set to benefit more in the future. Just as any technological advance opens discussions about ethics, so the implications of AI for HPE ethics need to be identified, anticipated, and accommodated so that HPE can utilise AI without compromising crucial ethical principles. Rather than focussing on AI technology, this Guide focuses on the ethical issues likely to face HPE teachers and administrators as they encounter and use AI systems in their teaching environment. While many of the ethical principles may be familiar to readers in other contexts, they will be viewed in light of AI, and some unfamiliar issues will be introduced. They include data gathering, anonymity, privacy, consent, data ownership, security, bias, transparency, responsibility, autonomy, and beneficence. In the Guide, each topic explains the concept and its importance and gives some indication of how to cope with its complexities. Ideas are drawn from personal experience and the relevant literature. In most topics, further reading is suggested so that readers may further explore the concepts at their leisure. The aim is for HPE teachers and decision-makers at all levels to be alert to these issues and to take proactive action to be prepared to deal with the ethical problems and opportunities that AI usage presents to HPE.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 584
页数:11
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Anderson C., 2008, Wired Magazine, V16, P16
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Guidance regarding methods for de-identification of protected health information in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) Privacy Rule
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): Regulation (EU) 2016/679
[4]   Predicting student outcomes using digital logs of learning behaviors: Review, current standards, and suggestions for future work [J].
Arizmendi, Cara J. ;
Bernacki, Matthew L. ;
Rakovic, Mladen ;
Plumley, Robert D. ;
Urban, Christopher J. ;
Panter, A. T. ;
Greene, Jeffrey A. ;
Gates, Kathleen M. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2023, 55 (06) :3026-3054
[5]   Ethnicity-related stereotypes and their impacts on medical students: A critical narrative review of health professions education literature [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Soham ;
Boylan, Conor T. ;
Baho, Yousif G. ;
Casey, Anna ;
Asif, Aqua ;
Khalil, Halimah ;
Badwi, Nermin ;
Patel, Rakesh .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (09) :986-996
[6]   On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? [J].
Bender, Emily M. ;
Gebru, Timnit ;
McMillan-Major, Angelina ;
Shmitchell, Shmargaret .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2021, 2021, :610-623
[7]   Formally Acknowledging Donor-Cadaver-Patients in the Basic and Clinical Science Research Arena [J].
Benninger, Brion .
CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2013, 26 (07) :810-813
[8]   Don't go 'Along' with corporate schemes to gather up student data [J].
Boninger, Faith ;
Molnar, Alex .
PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2022, 103 (07) :33-37
[9]  
Bornet P., 2021, TWEET
[10]  
Boughman E., 2017, LEGAL ISSUES POSED V