Readability of online COVID-19 health information and advice

被引:7
作者
Bould, Kathryn [1 ]
Forshaw, Mark J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Psychol, Tom Reilly Bldg Byrom St, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
关键词
Readability; COVID-19; coronavirus; online health information; INTERNET; QUALITY; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1080/14635240.2022.2098160
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Readability is a systematic measure of ease, with which written information can be read and understood. It can affect the reader's ability to access, comprehend, and utilize health information. This study assessed the readability of online COVID-19 information readily available to the public to engage with. At a time when organisations and institutions were rapidly providing advice and reacting to a developing pandemic, it was hypothesised that some of that haste would be associated with a lack of clarity, as measured by readability indices. N = 65 website sources containing information relating to COVID-19 were accessed and assessed for inclusion in the study. Eight readability indices, including Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, were calculated to determine readability scores for each source of information. Readability scores varied greatly between individual sources of COVID-19 information. Despite the recommendation that information be presented to the general public at a sixth-grade reading level, most websites we assessed addressing COVID-19 information and advice presented content at greater than the recommended reading level. Based on these results, a significant amount of information available on the Internet about COVID-19 will not be easily readable for many individuals attempting to use the Internet to help inform their decisions about their health and behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 209
页数:21
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, Directives for standardization-Part 1: Rules for the structure and drafting of standardizing documents: GB/T1.1-2020
  • [2] Patient Education Materials From the Layperson's Perspective The Importance of Readability
    Blanck, Alyson W.
    Marshall, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 27 (02) : E8 - E10
  • [3] Boulos Maged N Kamel, 2005, Diabetes Technol Ther, V7, P528, DOI 10.1089/dia.2005.7.528
  • [4] DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices
    Charnock, D
    Shepperd, S
    Needham, G
    Gann, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [5] Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information
    Cheng, Christina
    Dunn, Matthew
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 39 (04) : 309 - 314
  • [6] Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review
    Daraz, Lubna
    Morrow, Allison S.
    Ponce, Oscar J.
    Farah, Wigdan
    Katabi, Abdulrahman
    Majzoub, Abdul
    Seisa, Mohamed O.
    Benkhadra, Raed
    Alsawas, Mouaz
    Larry, Prokop
    Murad, M. Hassan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2018, 33 (05) : 487 - 492
  • [7] Eng T.R., 2001, The e-health landscape: A terrain map of emerging information and communication technologies in health and health care
  • [8] Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web - A systematic review
    Eysenbach, G
    Powell, J
    Kuss, O
    Sa, ER
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (20): : 2691 - 2700
  • [9] Multilingual Analysis of the Quality and Readability of Online Health Information on the Adverse Effects of Breast Cancer Treatments
    Fefer, Maia
    Lamb, Carolyn C.
    Shen, Abra H.
    Clardy, Peter
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    Devlin, Phillip M.
    Dee, Edward Christopher
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (08) : 781 - 784
  • [10] Commentary: COVID-19 in patients with diabetes
    Hill, Michael A.
    Mantzoros, Christos
    Sowers, James R.
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2020, 107