Improved landslide susceptibility mapping using unsupervised and supervised collaborative machine learning models

被引:28
作者
Su, Chenxu [1 ]
Wang, Bijiao [1 ]
Lv, Yunhong [1 ]
Zhang, Mingpeng [1 ]
Peng, Dalei [2 ]
Bate, Bate [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Shuai [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, MOE Key Lab Soft Soils & Geoenvironm Engn, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; machine learning; remote sensing; earthquake; risk; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; EARTHQUAKE; CLASSIFICATION; REGION; COUNTY;
D O I
10.1080/17499518.2022.2088802
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Datasets containing recorded landslide and non-landslide samples can greatly influence the performance of machine learning (ML) models, which are commonly used in landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). However, the non-landslide samples cannot be directly obtained. In this study, a pattern-based approach is proposed to improve the LSM process, constructing unsupervised machine learning (UML) - supervised machine learning (SML) collaborative models in which the non-landslide samples can be reasonably selected. Two UML models, the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and K-means, are introduced to sample the non-landslide datasets with four sampling selections (abbreviated as A, B, C and D, respectively). Then non-landslide patterns recognised by the UML models are learned by the random forest (RF). A new sensitivity index, accuracy improvement ratio (AIR), is defined to evaluate the superiority of these sampling selections. Compared with the GMM-RF model, the K-means-RF model is more capable of recognising non-landslide patterns and providing sufficient and reliable non-landslide samples. The sampling selection A of the K-means-RF with an AIR value of 2.3 is regarded as the best selection. The results indicate that the UML-SML model based on the pattern-based approach offers an effective strategy to find the non-landslide samples and has a better solution to the LSM.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 405
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia [J].
Aditian, Aril ;
Kubota, Tetsuya ;
Shinohara, Yoshinori .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2018, 318 :101-111
[2]   Support Vector Machines for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Staffora River Basin Case Study, Italy [J].
Ballabio, Cristiano ;
Sterlacchini, Simone .
MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 44 (01) :47-70
[3]   Identification of landslide susceptibility zones in Gish River basin, West Bengal, India [J].
Basu, Tirthankar ;
Pal, Swades .
GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2018, 12 (01) :14-28
[4]   Spatial prediction of landslides using a hybrid machine learning approach based on Random Subspace and Classification and Regression Trees [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Dieu Tien Bui .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2018, 303 :256-270
[5]   Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Peng, Jianbing ;
Hong, Haoyuan ;
Shahabi, Himan ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Liu, Junzhi ;
Zhu, A-Xing ;
Pei, Xiangjun ;
Duan, Zhao .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 626 :1121-1135
[6]   Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping [J].
Chung, CJF ;
Fabbri, AG .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2003, 30 (03) :451-472
[7]   Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy) [J].
Conforti, Massimo ;
Pascale, Stefania ;
Robustelli, Gaetano ;
Sdao, Francesco .
CATENA, 2014, 113 :236-250
[8]   Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree [J].
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Tran Anh Tuan ;
Klempe, Harald ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Revhaug, Inge .
LANDSLIDES, 2016, 13 (02) :361-378
[9]   Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study [J].
Felicisimo, Angel ;
Cuartero, Aurora ;
Remondo, Juan ;
Quiros, Elia .
LANDSLIDES, 2013, 10 (02) :175-189
[10]   Introducing a novel multi-layer perceptron network based on stochastic gradient descent optimized by a meta-heuristic algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping [J].
Hong, Haoyuan ;
Tsangaratos, Paraskevas ;
Ilia, Ioanna ;
Loupasakis, Constantinos ;
Wang, Yi .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 742