Facilitating teamwork in emergency management: The team process checklist

被引:3
作者
Bearman, Chris [1 ,2 ]
Hayes, Peter [1 ]
Thomason, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Appleton Inst, Rockhampton, Australia
[2] A Prof Chris Bearman,44 Greenhill Rd, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
关键词
Teamwork; Emergency management; Checklist; Human-centered design; Non-technical skills; COORDINATED DECISION-MAKING; TRUST; COMMUNICATION; PERFORMANCE; BREAKDOWNS; ORGANIZATIONS; CONSEQUENCES; METAANALYSIS; COOPERATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103979
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Emergency management (EM) teams typically operate in complex dynamic environments where they need to synthesize incomplete, contradictory or overwhelming amounts of information into intelligence and produce outputs in a short time-scale. Independent inquiries following largescale emergencies highlight the central role that team processes such as communication, coordination, and cooperation play in enabling the effective performance of teams. This article describes the development and evaluation of the Team Process Checklist (TPC). The TPC is a 17 item checklist that is designed to help observers and/or team members better understand and manage EM teams both in real time and after the event (in debriefs and after action reviews). Items for the TPC were identified in the literature on communication, coordination and cooperation and then developed through five different regional coordination center (RCC) exercises by observers who used the TPC to evaluate the teamwork of the RCC. Following the development phase four evaluation studies were conducted with EM personnel. In these studies the TPC was rated as having very good usefulness, clarity, and comprehensiveness. The TPC therefore shows considerable promise as a simple, straight-forward way to help people in EM better understand and manage their teams in real time and after the event.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 107 条
[61]  
Lantz A., 2020, The Problems with Teamwork, and How to Solve Them
[62]  
LEONARDBARTON D, 1985, HARVARD BUS REV, V63, P102
[63]   The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups [J].
Lester, SW ;
Meglino, BM ;
Korsgaard, MA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (02) :352-368
[64]   Multiteam Systems: A Structural Framework and Meso-Theory of System Functioning [J].
Luciano, Margaret M. ;
DeChurch, Leslie A. ;
Mathieu, John E. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 44 (03) :1065-1096
[65]   Meta-Analysis of Surgical Safety Checklist Effects on Teamwork, Communication, Morbidity, Mortality, and Safety [J].
Lyons, Vanessa E. ;
Popejoy, Lori L. .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2014, 36 (02) :245-261
[66]  
Macleod N., 2005, Building safe systems in aviation. A CRM developer's handbook
[67]  
MacMillan J., 2004, Team cognition: Process and ., DOI DOI 10.1037/10690-004
[68]   Teamwork in multiteam systems [J].
Marks, MA ;
DeChurch, LA ;
Mathieu, JE ;
Panzer, FJ ;
Alonso, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (05) :964-971
[69]   A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes [J].
Marks, MA ;
Mathieu, JE ;
Zaccaro, SJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (03) :356-376
[70]  
Mathieu J.E., 2001, ORG PSYCHOL VOL 2, V2, P289, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781848608368.N16