Facilitating teamwork in emergency management: The team process checklist

被引:2
作者
Bearman, Chris [1 ,2 ]
Hayes, Peter [1 ]
Thomason, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Appleton Inst, Rockhampton, Australia
[2] A Prof Chris Bearman,44 Greenhill Rd, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
关键词
Teamwork; Emergency management; Checklist; Human-centered design; Non-technical skills; COORDINATED DECISION-MAKING; TRUST; COMMUNICATION; PERFORMANCE; BREAKDOWNS; ORGANIZATIONS; CONSEQUENCES; METAANALYSIS; COOPERATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103979
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Emergency management (EM) teams typically operate in complex dynamic environments where they need to synthesize incomplete, contradictory or overwhelming amounts of information into intelligence and produce outputs in a short time-scale. Independent inquiries following largescale emergencies highlight the central role that team processes such as communication, coordination, and cooperation play in enabling the effective performance of teams. This article describes the development and evaluation of the Team Process Checklist (TPC). The TPC is a 17 item checklist that is designed to help observers and/or team members better understand and manage EM teams both in real time and after the event (in debriefs and after action reviews). Items for the TPC were identified in the literature on communication, coordination and cooperation and then developed through five different regional coordination center (RCC) exercises by observers who used the TPC to evaluate the teamwork of the RCC. Following the development phase four evaluation studies were conducted with EM personnel. In these studies the TPC was rated as having very good usefulness, clarity, and comprehensiveness. The TPC therefore shows considerable promise as a simple, straight-forward way to help people in EM better understand and manage their teams in real time and after the event.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]   Challenges in multi-agency collaboration in disaster management: A Sri Lankan perspective [J].
Abdeen, F. N. ;
Fernando, T. ;
Kulatunga, U. ;
Hettige, S. ;
Ranasinghe, K. D. Arjuna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 62
[2]  
AFAC, 2017, AUSTR INT INC MAN SY
[3]   Decision inertia: Deciding between least worst outcomes in emergency responses to disasters [J].
Alison, Laurence ;
Power, Nicola ;
van den Heuvel, Claudia ;
Humann, Michael ;
Palasinksi, Marek ;
Crego, Jonathan .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 88 (02) :295-321
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 9241 210 2010 ERGONO
[5]  
Badiru A., 2017, Handbook of Emergency Response: A Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approach, P413
[6]  
Baker DP, 2001, IMPROVING TEAMWORK IN ORGANIZATIONS, P131
[7]  
Barnlund D.C., 2008, COMMUN THEOR, V2nd, P47
[8]  
Bearman C, 2017, Hazard Note, P1
[9]  
Bearman C, 2018, Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC Report No.532
[10]  
Bearman C., 2017, Brigade, V37, P14