Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Barufaldi, Laura A. [1 ,5 ]
de Albuquerque, Rita de C. R. [1 ]
do Nascimento, Aline [1 ]
Martins, Luis Felipe L. [2 ]
Zimmermann, Ivan R. [3 ]
de Souza, Mirian C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Surveillance & Situat Anal, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Brasilia, Brazil
[4] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Populat Res, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[5] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, 125 Marques Pombal St, BR-20230240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
antibodies; colorectal neoplasms; cost-effectiveness evaluation; health evaluation; monoclonal; neoplasm metastasis; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; CETUXIMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; PANITUMUMAB; FOLFIRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2023.04.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: A partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing thera-peutic options in a 10 years' time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: The most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71195.40/ QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 33 threshold. Conclusions: The therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies in the First-line Treatment of RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Morimoto, Takashi
    Fujito, Kaori
    Yamasaki, Bumpei
    Goto, Rei
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 45 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia
    Elsamany, Shereef
    Elsisi, Gihan Hamdy
    Hassanin, Fayza Ahmed Mohamed
    Saleh, Khaldoon
    Tashkandi, Emad
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 28 : 67 - 75
  • [3] Monoclonal Antibodies for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Liao, Pei-Fei
    Wu, Ta-Wei
    Peng, Tzu-Rong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 31 (03) : e286 - e297
  • [4] A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Lange, A.
    Prenzler, A.
    Frank, M.
    Kirstein, M.
    Vogel, A.
    von der Schulenburg, J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of first-line treatments for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Ewara, E. M.
    Zaric, G. S.
    Welch, S.
    Sarma, S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : E541 - E550
  • [6] The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in England and Wales
    Tappenden, P.
    Jones, R.
    Paisley, S.
    Carroll, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (17) : 2487 - 2494
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment after first-line induction treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Franken, M. D.
    van Rooijen, E. M.
    May, A. M.
    Koffijberg, H.
    van Tinteren, H.
    Mol, L.
    ten Tije, A. J.
    Creemers, G. J.
    van der Velden, A. M. T.
    Tanis, B. C.
    Groot, C. A. Uyl-de
    Punt, C. J. A.
    Koopman, M.
    van Oijen, M. G. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 75 : 204 - 212
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI treatment in first-line and second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Li, Xianglian
    Bao, Jianan
    Ma, Jingjing
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan
    Shiroiwa, Takeru
    Fukuda, Takashi
    Tsutani, Kiichiro
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (10) : 2256 - 2267
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Compared with Bevacizumab for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Germany
    Frank, M.
    Lange, A.
    Michailov, G.
    Lebioda, A.
    GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2016, 21 (04): : 203 - 209