Prospective Performance Evaluation of the miDiagnostics COVID-19 PCR Test for Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Detection on Nasopharyngeal Swabs

被引:2
作者
Bos, David A. G. [1 ]
Lagrou, Katrien [2 ]
Verbakel, Jan Y. Y. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, EPI Ctr, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, NIHR Community Healthcare Medtech & IVD cooperat, Oxford, England
关键词
COVID-19; PCR testing; diagnostic accuracy; point of care; prospective performance;
D O I
10.1128/jcm.01871-22
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rapid diagnosis or exclusion of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential for correct medical management decisions regarding COVID-19. High-throughput laboratory-based reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR testing is accurate with longer turnaround times, while rapid antigen tests show moderate sensitivity. Rapid diagnosis or exclusion of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential for correct medical management decisions regarding COVID-19. High-throughput laboratory-based reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR testing is accurate with longer turnaround times, while rapid antigen tests show moderate sensitivity. In search of a fast and reliable COVID-19 test, we aimed to validate the rapid miDiagnostics COVID-19 PCR test. We recruited symptomatic and asymptomatic participants in a mobile COVID-19 test center in Belgium. We collected three nasopharyngeal samples from each participant. The index sample was tested on the miDiagnostics COVID-19 PCR reader, the reference sample was tested on the reference TaqPath COVID-19 PCR test in the Belgian Reference Center for Respiratory Pathogens of University Hospitals Leuven, and a third sample was collected for discordance testing with the PerkinElmer SARS-CoV-2 PCR kit. A total of 770 participants yielded 763 sets of included nasopharyngeal samples. Overall positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of the miDiagnostics COVID-19 PCR test were 95.5% (92.6% to 97.4%) and 94.9% (92.3 to 96.8%), rising to 98.6% (96.5% to 99.6%) and 96.5% (92.6% to 98.7%) in symptomatic patients. Discordance testing reclassified 15 of 21 false-positive cases as true positive. A retest of the miDiagnostics PCR test was performed in 61 tests (7.4%) due to a technical error. The miDiagnostics COVID-19 PCR test showed excellent clinical accuracy. The fast and reliable results allow for rapid correct diagnosis and tailored medical management decisions regarding COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Performance Evaluation of the SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 Test for Point-of-Care Detection of SARS-CoV-2 [J].
Assennato, Sonny M. ;
Ritchie, Allyson, V ;
Nadala, Cesar ;
Goel, Neha ;
Tie, Cuijuan ;
Nadala, Lourdes M. ;
Zhang, Hongyi ;
Datir, Rawlings ;
Gupta, Ravindra K. ;
Curran, Martin D. ;
Lee, Helen H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (01)
[2]   Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution [J].
Basu, Atreyee ;
Zinger, Tatyana ;
Inglima, Kenneth ;
Woo, Kar-Mun ;
Atie, Onome ;
Yurasits, Lauren ;
See, Benjamin ;
Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
[3]   Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Brummer, Lukas E. ;
Katzenschlager, Stephan ;
Gaeddert, Mary ;
Erdmann, Christian ;
Schmitz, Stephani ;
Bota, Marc ;
Grilli, Maurizio ;
Larmann, Jan ;
Weigand, Markus A. ;
Pollock, Nira R. ;
Mace, Aurelien ;
Carmona, Sergio ;
Ongarello, Stefano ;
Sacks, Jilian A. ;
Denkinger, Claudia M. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (08)
[4]   Complications of nasal SARS-CoV-2 testing: a review [J].
Clark, James H. ;
Pang, Sharon ;
Naclerio, Robert M. ;
Kashima, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 69 (08) :1399-1403
[5]  
Datta D, 2017, blandr: a Bland-Altman method comparison package for R
[6]   Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Review) [J].
Dinnes, Jacqueline ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Adriano, Ada ;
Berhane, Sarah ;
Davenport, Clare ;
Dittrich, Sabine ;
Emperador, Devy ;
Takwoingi, Yemisi ;
Cunningham, Jane ;
Beese, Sophie ;
Dretzke, Janine ;
di Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante ;
Harris, Isobel M. ;
Price, Malcolm J. ;
Taylor-Phillips, Sian ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Leeflang, Mariska M. G. ;
Spijker, Rene ;
Van den Bruel, Ann .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (08)
[7]   Evaluation of the Cue Health point-of-care COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification) test at a community drive through collection center [J].
Donato, Leslie J. ;
Trivedi, Vipul A. ;
Stransky, Angie M. ;
Misra, Artika ;
Pritt, Bobbi S. ;
Binnicker, Matthew J. ;
Karon, Brad S. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 100 (01)
[8]   Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study [J].
Gibani, Malick M. ;
Toumazou, Christofer ;
Sohbati, Mohammadreza ;
Sahoo, Rashmita ;
Karvela, Maria ;
Hon, Tsz-Kin ;
De Mateo, Sara ;
Burdett, Alison ;
Leung, K. Y. Felice ;
Barnett, Jake ;
Orbeladze, Arman ;
Luan, Song ;
Pournias, Stavros ;
Sun, Jiayang ;
Flower, Barney ;
Bedzo-Nutakor, Judith ;
Amran, Maisarah ;
Quinlan, Rachael ;
Skolimowska, Keira ;
Herrera, Carolina ;
Rowan, Aileen ;
Badhan, Anjna ;
Klaber, Robert ;
Davies, Gary ;
Muir, David ;
Randell, Paul ;
Crook, Derrick ;
Taylor, Graham P. ;
Barclay, Wendy ;
Mughal, Nabeela ;
Moore, Luke S. P. ;
Jeffery, Katie ;
Cooke, Graham S. .
LANCET MICROBE, 2020, 1 (07) :E300-E307
[9]   ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis [J].
Ginestet, Cedric .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2011, 174 :245-245
[10]   Point-of-Care PCR Assays for COVID-19 Detection [J].
Gupta, Niharika ;
Augustine, Shine ;
Narayan, Tarun ;
O'Riordan, Alan ;
Das, Asmita ;
Kumar, D. ;
Luong, John H. T. ;
Malhotra, Bansi D. .
BIOSENSORS-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05)