Multi-objective chaos game optimization

被引:20
作者
Khodadadi, Nima [1 ]
Abualigah, Laith [2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Al-Tashi, Qasem [3 ,4 ]
Mirjalili, Seyedali [5 ,6 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, 1251 Mem Dr, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
[2] Middle East Univ, MEU Res Unit, Amman 11831, Jordan
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Albaydha, Albaydha, Yemen
[5] Torrens Univ Australia, Ctr Artificial Intelligence Res & Optimizat, Sydney, Australia
[6] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Frontier Lab, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Al Ahliyya Amman Univ, Hourani Ctr Appl Sci Res, Amman 19328, Jordan
[8] Al al Bayt Univ, Prince Hussein Bin Abdullah Fac Informat Technol, Comp Sci Dept, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
[9] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman 11931, Jordan
[10] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Algorithm; Bechmark; Artificial Intelligence; Multi-objective optimization; CEC benchmark; Chaos game optimization; Engineering problems; Optimization; GREY WOLF OPTIMIZER; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00521-023-08432-0
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Chaos Game Optimization (CGO) has only recently gained popularity, but its effective searching capabilities have a lot of potential for addressing single-objective optimization issues. Despite its advantages, this method can only tackle problems formulated with one objective. The multi-objective CGO proposed in this study is utilized to handle the problems with several objectives (MOCGO). In MOCGO, Pareto-optimal solutions are stored in a fixed-sized external archive. In addition, the leader selection functionality needed to carry out multi-objective optimization has been included in CGO. The technique is also applied to eight real-world engineering design challenges with multiple objectives. The MOCGO algorithm uses several mathematical models in chaos theory and fractals inherited from CGO. This algorithm's performance is evaluated using seventeen case studies, such as CEC-09, ZDT, and DTLZ. Six well-known multi-objective algorithms are compared with MOCGO using four different performance metrics. The results demonstrate that the suggested method is better than existing ones. These Pareto-optimal solutions show excellent convergence and coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:14973 / 15004
页数:32
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [21] Kennedy J, 1995, 1995 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-6, P1942, DOI 10.1109/icnn.1995.488968
  • [22] Khazalah A., 2022, Classification Applications with Deep Learning and Machine Learning Technologies, P107
  • [23] Khodadadi N., 2022, HDB MOTH FLAME OPTIM, P79, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781003205326-7
  • [24] Khodadadi N., 2023, Advances in swarm intelligence: variations and adaptations for optimization problems, P407, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-09835-222, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-09835-222]
  • [25] Khodadadi N., 2022, Neural Comput. & Applic., P1
  • [26] AMHS: Archive-Based Multi-objective Harmony Search Algorithm
    Khodadadi, Nima
    Gharehchopogh, Farhad Soleimanian
    Abdollahzadeh, Benyamin
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONY SEARCH, SOFT COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (ICHSA 2022), 2022, 140 : 259 - 269
  • [27] An Archive-Based Multi-Objective Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Solving Industrial Engineering Problems
    Khodadadi, Nima
    Abualigah, Laith
    El-Kenawy, El-Sayed M.
    Snasel, Vaclav
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 106673 - 106698
  • [28] Multi-objective Stochastic Paint Optimizer (MOSPO)
    Khodadadi, Nima
    Abualigah, Laith
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2022, 34 (20) : 18035 - 18058
  • [29] MOTEO: a novel multi-objective thermal exchange optimization algorithm for engineering problems
    Khodadadi, Nima
    Talatahari, Siamak
    Eslamlou, Armin Dadras
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (14) : 6659 - 6684
  • [30] Multi-Objective Crystal Structure Algorithm (MOCryStAl): Introduction and Performance Evaluation
    Khodadadi, Nima
    Azizi, Mahdi
    Talatahari, Siamak
    Sareh, Pooya
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 117795 - 117812