Tacit knowledge sharing within project teams: an application of social commitments theory

被引:3
作者
Ngoc Lan Nguyen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Econ Univ, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Tacit knowledge sharing; Shared responsibility; Normative conformity; Affective bonding; Serial reciprocity; Project teams; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; INTERDEPENDENCE; PERFORMANCE; COHESION; EXCHANGE; TASK; IMPACT; DETERMINANTS; PERSPECTIVES; COHESIVENESS;
D O I
10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0123
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose Applying social commitments theory, this paper aims to study the effect of shared responsibility as a structural characteristic of project teams to foster tacit knowledge sharing with the mediating role of affective bonding. Besides, the moderating effect of normative conformity is also examined. Design/methodology/approach The quantitative method was applied through surveying senior auditors representing 263 audit teams in Vietnam to examine the model. Findings This study found that in the joint projects, when team members perceive high shared responsibility for both success and failure, the affective bonding among them are generated. The affective bonding becomes salient to tacit knowledge sharing only when the team members perceive high obligations to conform the general knowledge sharing norms and the serial reciprocity norms. Originality/value This study provides the evidence for partial confirmation and expansion of the social commitments theory. The practical takeaways are provided for managers of project-based organizations in the social aspects for facilitating sharing culture.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 58
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[41]   Serial reciprocity: A preliminary statement [J].
Moody, Michael .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2008, 26 (02) :130-151
[42]   The concept of "ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation [J].
Nonaka, I ;
Konno, N .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 40 (03) :40-+
[43]   THE IMPACT OF NORMATIVE SOCIAL-INFLUENCE AND COHESIVENESS ON TASK PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES - A SOCIAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING APPROACH [J].
OREILLY, CA ;
CALDWELL, DF .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 58 (03) :193-206
[44]  
Pais L, 2015, WILEY BLACKWELL HANDBOOK OF THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TRAINING, DEVELOPMENT, AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT, P278
[45]   Conceptualising social media support for tacit knowledge sharing: physicians' perspectives and experiences [J].
Panahi, Sirous ;
Watson, Jason ;
Partridge, Helen .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 20 (02) :344-363
[46]   Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: Explicating the role of dependence and trust [J].
Park, Jun-Gi ;
Lee, Jungwoo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (01) :153-165
[47]   Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It [J].
Podsakoff, Philip M. ;
MacKenzie, Scott B. ;
Podsakoff, Nathan P. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 63, 2012, 63 :539-569
[48]   Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams [J].
Porac, JF ;
Wade, JB ;
Fischer, HM ;
Brown, J ;
Kanfer, A ;
Bowker, G .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (04) :661-678
[49]   The role of exchange and emotion on commitment: A study of teachers [J].
Price, Heather E. ;
Collett, Jessica L. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2012, 41 (06) :1469-1479
[50]   Knowledge sharing within teams: enabling and constraining factors [J].
Rosendaal, Bastiaan ;
Bijlsma-Frankema, Katinka .
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2015, 13 (03) :235-247