COVID-19 vaccination plans in Latin America and the Caribbean: a multi-country comparative analysis of prioritization strategies

被引:1
作者
Woodbine, M. J. Hernandez [1 ]
Fernandez-Nino, J. A. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Rodriguez-Villamizar, L. A. [4 ]
Rojas-Botero, M. L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Norte, Dept Salud Publ, Barranquilla, Colombia
[4] Univ Ind Santander, Dept Salud Publ, Bucaramanga, Colombia
[5] Univ Antioquia, Fac Nacl Salud Publ, Medellin, Colombia
[6] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, 615 N Wolfe St,Room E8532, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
COVID-19; Vaccination; Health priorities; Health policy; Latin America; Caribbean; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2023.12.035
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to synthesize and compare the prioritization strategies outlined in the national vaccination plans (NVPs) against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) developed by countries in the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region. Study design: We conducted a comparative policy analysis based on COVID-19 NVPs. Methods: We conducted a search strategy in three stages to identify NVPs for COVID-19 across 41 countries/territories in the LAC region. Sources included official governmental repositories, complementary Google searches, and less formal documentation. We extracted key variables and conducted a comparative policy analysis based on the prioritization criteria and specific prioritization groups. Results: The study identified 52 NVPs for COVID-19, corresponding to 27 (65.8 %) out of 41 countries/ territories in the LAC region. Official national websites yielded documents for 12 countries. All NVPs included frontline healthcare personnel in the first prioritization phase/stage, whilst some included residents of long-term healthcare facilities, adults aged 60 years or more, and people with disabilities. The decision criteria for prioritization were declared in 14 countries/territories. Ethical considerations declared in five NVPs included human welfare, equality, solidarity, equity, and social justice as values. Conclusion: The early stages of vaccination rollout in LAC countries prioritized protection of the healthcare system and epidemiological risk for severe disease. Few countries included ethical considerations in their NVPs, and global inequities in vaccine access and distribution led to varied protections for vulnerable populations across LAC. This analysis highlights the need for improved emergencyresponse capacity, planning, and enhanced multilateral cooperation in the LAC region for future public health emergencies. (c) 2024 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 170
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Responses to COVID-19 in five Latin American countries
    Alejandra Benitez, Maria
    Velasco, Carolina
    Sequeira, Ana Rita
    Henriquez, Josefa
    Menezes, Flavio M.
    Paolucci, Francesco
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (04) : 525 - 559
  • [2] Cost Utility of Vaccination Against COVID-19 in Brazil
    Alves Fernandes, Ricardo Ribeiro
    Santos, Marisa da Silva
    da Silva Magliano, Carlos Alberto
    Tura, Bernardo Rangel
    Damico Nascimento Macedo, Luana Schroeder
    Padila, Matheus Piccin
    Wekmuller Franca, Ana Claudia
    Braga, Andressa Araujo
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 31 : 18 - 24
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, LANCET, V398, P93, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01551-8
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, Countries
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, Forbes StaffJanuary 15
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2021, Honoring Latin America's COVID vaccine triumphs in 2021
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2023, Countries and centers
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, Cubadebate
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2021, Access to the COVID-19 vaccine in Venezuela
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2020, COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean: an overview of government responses to the crisis