PI-RADS: Where Next?

被引：23

作者：

Turkbey, Baris ^{[1
]}

Purysko, Andrei S. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] NCI, Mol Imaging Branch, NIH, 10 Ctr Dr,MSC 1182,Bldg 10,Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA

[2] Cleveland Clin, Sect Abdominal Imaging, Dept Nucl Radiol, Imaging Inst, Cleveland, OH USA

来源：

RADIOLOGY | 2023年 / 307卷 / 05期

关键词：

DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT VALUES; SYSTEM VERSION 2; PROSTATE-CANCER; MRI; OUTCOMES; IMAGES; RISK; MEN;

D O I：

10.1148/radiol.223128

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

Prostate MRI plays an important role in the clinical management of localized prostate cancer, mainly assisting in biopsy decisions and guiding biopsy procedures. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) has been available to radiologists since 2012, with the most up-to-date and actively used version being PI-RADS version 2.1. This review article discusses the current use of PIRADS, including its limitations and controversies, and summarizes research that aims to improve future iterations of this system.

引用

页数：13

共 50 条

[41] Editorial Comment: A Close Look at PI-RADS Version 2.1 and Where We Should Go From Here
Chang, Silvia D.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (01) : 32 - 32
[42] Perilesional Biopsies Increase Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in Men with PI-RADS 4/5 Lesions: Validation of the PI-RADS Steering Committee Recommendation
Lahoud, John
Doan, Paul
Kim, Lawrence
Patel, Manish I.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (02) : 260 - 261
[43] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS V1 and PI-RADS V2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
He, Ying
Cong, Ruochen
Zhou, Jie
Xu, Zhenyu
Yang, Jushun
Wang, Lin
Xiao, Jing
He, Bosheng
UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (01) : 51 - 57
[44] Reconciling discordance between PI-RADS 4 lesions and targeted biopsy: Early experience of a multidisciplinary quality improvement protocol with PI-RADS 4 subcategorization
Deivasigamani, Sriram
Kotamarti, Srinath
Adams, Eric S.
Seguier, Denis
Zhang, Dylan
Michael, Zoe
Polascik, Thomas J.
Gupta, Rajan T.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 165
[45] Accuracy and Interobserver Variability in Reporting of PI-RADS Version 2
Flood, Thomas F.
Pokharel, Sajal S.
Patel, Nayana U.
Clark, Toshimasa J.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (09) : 1202 - 1205
[46] PI-RADS 3 MRI lesions: Are biopsies still necessary?
Depaquit, Thibaut Long
Uleri, Alessandro
Peyrottes, Arthur
Corral, Renaud
Toledano, Harry
Chiron, Paul
Bastide, Cyrille
Baboudjian, Michael
FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 35 (03):
[47] Standardization of Multiparametric Prostate MR Imaging Using PI-RADS
Bomers, Joyce G. R.
Barentsz, Jelle O.
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
[48] PI-RADS 2.0 for Recurrence Prognosis after radical Prostatectomy
Heberer, Bettina
AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2017, 48 (05) : 414 - 414
[49] A practical primer on PI-RADS version 2: a pictorial essay
Gary Lloyd Horn
Peter Florin Hahn
Shahin Tabatabaei
Mukesh Harisinghani
Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 899 - 906
[50] Could AI Assistance Close the PI-RADS Variability Gap?
Chong, Jaron J. R.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (02) : 484 - 485

← 1 2 3 4 5 →