PI-RADS: Where Next?

被引：23

作者：

Turkbey, Baris ^{[1
]}

Purysko, Andrei S. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] NCI, Mol Imaging Branch, NIH, 10 Ctr Dr,MSC 1182,Bldg 10,Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA

[2] Cleveland Clin, Sect Abdominal Imaging, Dept Nucl Radiol, Imaging Inst, Cleveland, OH USA

来源：

RADIOLOGY | 2023年 / 307卷 / 05期

关键词：

DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT VALUES; SYSTEM VERSION 2; PROSTATE-CANCER; MRI; OUTCOMES; IMAGES; RISK; MEN;

D O I：

10.1148/radiol.223128

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

Prostate MRI plays an important role in the clinical management of localized prostate cancer, mainly assisting in biopsy decisions and guiding biopsy procedures. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) has been available to radiologists since 2012, with the most up-to-date and actively used version being PI-RADS version 2.1. This review article discusses the current use of PIRADS, including its limitations and controversies, and summarizes research that aims to improve future iterations of this system.

引用

页数：13

共 50 条

[21] Comparison of the PI-RADS 2.1 scoring system to PI-RADS 2.0: Impact on diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement
Hotker, Andreas M.
Bluthgen, Christian
Rupp, Niels J.
Schneider, Aurelia F.
Eberli, Daniel
Donati, Olivio F.
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
[22] Factors Impacting Performance and Reproducibility of PI-RADS
Turkbey, Baris
Oto, Aytekin
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (03): : 337 - 338
[23] PI-RADS: what is new and how to use it
Dutruel, Silvina P.
Jeph, Sunil
Margolis, Daniel J. A.
Wehrli, Natasha
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) : 3951 - 3960
[24] Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1
Ullrich, T.
Schimmoeller, L.
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) : 3961 - 3968
[25] Evaluation of prostate volume in mpMRI: comparison of the recommendations of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1
Gundogdu, Elif
Emekli, Emre
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (01) : 15 - 19
[26] The role of negative magnetic resonance imaging: can we safely avoid biopsy in PI-RADS 2 as in PI-RADS 1?
Regis, Lucas
Celma, Ana
Planas, Jacques
Lopez, Ricardo
Roche, Sarai
Lorente, David
Placer, Jose
Trilla, Enrique
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 53 (01) : 21 - 25
[27] Simplified PI-RADS with Biparametric MRI: A Practical Approach to Improve Management of PI-RADS Version 2 Category 3 Lesions Response
Turkbey, Baris
Choyke, Peter L.
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 882 - 883
[28] NEED FOR SYSTEMIC 12-CORE BIOPSY CONCURRENT WITH MRI TARGETED BIOPSY OF PI-RADS 4 AND PI-RADS 5 LESIONS
Yaguchi, Grace
Deebajah, Mustafa
Williamson, Sean
Gupta, Nilesh
Pantelic, Milan
Park, Hakmin
Peabody, James
Menon, Mani
Alanee, Shaheen
Dabaja, Ali
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E177 - E178
[29] Automatic PI-RADS assignment by means of formal methods
Brunese, Luca
Brunese, Maria Chiara
Carbone, Mattia
Ciccone, Vincenzo
Mercaldo, Francesco
Santone, Antonella
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2022, 127 (01): : 83 - 89
[30] Reply to "Is PI-RADS Ready for Biparametric Prostate MRI?"
Correia, Eduardo T. de Oliveira
Purysko, Andrei S.
Paranhos, Bruno Merz
Shoag, Jonathan E.
Padhani, Anwar R.
Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (05)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →