Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study

被引:3
作者
Kraska, Jake [1 ,2 ]
Bell, Karen [1 ]
Costello, Shane [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Sch Educ Psychol & Counselling, Clayton, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Sch Educ Psychol & Counselling, 19 Ancora Imparo Way, Clayton 3800, Australia
关键词
graded response model; DASS-21; CAT; computer adaptive testing; simulation; psychological distress; depression; anxiety; stress; mental health; screening tool; tool; reliability; development; model; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; FIT INDEXES; NORMATIVE DATA; SAMPLE-SIZE; DASS; VERSION; COEFFICIENT; RELIABILITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.2196/45334
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) is a mental health screening tool with conflicting studies regarding its factor structure. No studies have yet attempted to develop a computer adaptive test (CAT) version of it. Objective: This study calibrated items for, and simulated, a DASS-21 CAT using a nonclinical sample. Methods: An evaluation sample (n=580) was used to evaluate the DASS-21 scales via confirmatory factor analysis, Mokken analysis, and graded response modeling. A CAT was simulated with a validation sample (n=248) and a simulated sample (n=10,000) to confirm the generalizability of the model developed. Results: A bifactor model, also known as the "quadripartite" model (1 general factor with 3 specific factors) in the context of the DASS-21, displayed good fit. All scales displayed acceptable fit with the graded response model. Simulation of 3 unidimensional (depression, anxiety, and stress) CATs resulted in an average 17% to 48% reduction in items administered when a reliability of 0.80 was acceptable. Conclusions: This study clarifies previous conflicting findings regarding the DASS-21 factor structure and suggests that the quadripartite model for the DASS-21 items fits best. Item response theory modeling suggests that the items measure their respective constructs best between 0 theta and 3 theta (mild to moderate severity).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[11]  
Cai L., 2014, Technical Report
[12]  
Carey T., 2018, INPSYCH
[13]   Generating Adaptive and Non-Adaptive Test Interfaces for Multidimensional Item Response Theory Applications [J].
Chalmers, R. Philip .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2016, 71 (05)
[14]  
Chalmers RP, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1
[15]   Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items [J].
Choi, Seung W. ;
Swartz, Richard J. .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2009, 33 (06) :419-440
[16]   Critical Values for Yen's Q3: Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations [J].
Christensen, Karl Bang ;
Makransky, Guido ;
Horton, Mike .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 41 (03) :178-194
[17]   The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample [J].
Crawford, JR ;
Henry, JD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 42 :111-131
[18]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[19]  
DASS FAQ, 2018, US
[20]   Evaluation of Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for longitudinal monitoring of depression, anxiety, and stress reactions [J].
Devine, Janine ;
Fliege, Herbert ;
Kocalevent, Rueya ;
Mierke, Annett ;
Klapp, Burghard F. ;
Rose, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 190 :846-853