Volatility spillover across Chinese carbon markets: Evidence from quantile connectedness method

被引:24
作者
Li, Zheng-Zheng [2 ,5 ]
Li, Yameng
Huang, Chia-Yun [3 ]
Peculea, Adelina Dumitrescu [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Newcastle, Business Sch, Newcastle, Australia
[3] Shanghai Int Studies Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Polit Studies & Publ Adm, Dept Econ & Publ Pol, Bucharest, Romania
[5] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, 78,Kedazhi Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon emission trading pilot; Volatility spillover; Quantile VAR; Risk contagion; CO2; EMISSION; NATURAL-GAS; ENERGY; CONTAGION; PRICES; PERSPECTIVES; DYNAMICS; LINKAGE; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106542
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper investigates the volatility spillover across China's carbon emission trading (CET) markets using the connectedness method based on the quantile VAR framework. The non-linear result shows strong volatility spillover effects in upper quantiles, resulting from major economic and political events. This is in accordance with the risk contagion hypothesis that volatility of carbon price returns is affected by the shocks of economic fundamentals and spills over to other pilots. Guangdong and Shanghai are the most significant contributors to volatility transmission because of their high liquidity and active markets. Hubei CET pilot has shifted from transmitter to receiver since the COVID-19 pandemic. Regarding the pairwise directional connectedness, geographical location and similar market attribute also matter in volatility transmission. This provides implications for policymakers and investors to attach importance to risk management given the quantile-based method rather than the average shocks.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   How COVID-19 drives connectedness among commodity and financial markets: Evidence from TVP-VAR and causality-in-quantiles techniques [J].
Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. ;
Oliyide, Johnson A. .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70
[2]   Connectedness of energy markets around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Akyildirim, Erdinc ;
Cepni, Oguzhan ;
Molnar, Peter ;
Uddin, Gazi Salah .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 109
[3]  
Ando T., 2018, Ssrn 3164772
[4]   Volatility spillovers amid crude oil, natural gas, coal, stock, and currency markets in the US and China based on time and frequency domain connectedness [J].
Asadi, Mehrad ;
Roubaud, David ;
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 109
[5]  
Benz E., 2006, Problems and Perspectives in Management, V4, P30
[6]   Investor sentiment: a retail trader activity approach [J].
Berger, Dave .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 21 (02) :61-82
[7]   Quantile connectedness in the cryptocurrency market [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Saeed, Tareq ;
Xuan Vinh Vo ;
Roubaud, David .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2021, 71
[8]  
Calvo S.G., 1996, Capital Flows to Latin America: Is There Evidence of Contagion Effects? Policy Research Working Paper 1619
[9]   The dynamic linkage effect between energy and emissions allowances price for regional emissions trading scheme pilots in China [J].
Chang, Kai ;
Ge, Fangping ;
Zhang, Chao ;
Wang, Weihong .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 98 :415-425
[10]   Market fragmentation, liquidity measures and improvement perspectives from China's emissions trading scheme pilots [J].
Chang, Kai ;
Chen, Rongda ;
Chevallier, Julien .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 75 :249-260