Diagnostic Validity of a Serological Test with the Current Infection Marker in Thai Adults before and after Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy

被引:0
作者
Piwchan, Setthachai [1 ]
Tossapornpong, Kittipoom [2 ]
Chuensakul, Suppana [1 ]
Sripariwuth, Ekawee [1 ]
机构
[1] Naresuan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Phitsanulok, Thailand
[2] Naresuan Univ, Dept Med, Fac Med, Phitsanulok, Thailand
关键词
Helicobacter pylori; Diagnosis; Ambulatory care; Serological test; Primary health care; GASTRIC-CANCER;
D O I
10.15430/JCP.2023.28.4.194
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Helicobacter pylori infection poses significant health risks, such as gastric adenocarcinoma, necessitating accurate diagnosis and effective treatment in primary care. This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of the serological current infection marker (CIM) test in identifying current H. pylori infection. The CIM test samples from 159 participants undergoing gastroscopy were collected, and H. pylori- positive outpatients received triple therapy based on histology or rapid urease test results. Following treatment, 45 patients underwent a 13C-urea breath test and the CIM test for eradication assessment. For pre-eradication, the CIM test demonstrated 89.6% sensitivity, 95.7% specificity, 93.8% positive predictive value, 92.6% negative predictive value, and 93.1% accuracy. Following post-eradication, the CIM test exhibited sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 71.4%, 92.1%, 62.5%, 94.6%, and 88.9%, respectively, using the 13C-urea breath test as the reference standard. The CIM test showcased commendable diagnostic performance, emphasizing its efficacy in both pre- and post-eradication scenarios. Notably, the accuracy, non-invasiveness, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness of the CIM test advocate for its recommendation as a preferred diagnostic tool in primary care settings for H. pylori infection detection.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 200
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, V61, P1
  • [2] Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection
    Best, Lawrence M. J.
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Siddique, Sulman
    Selladurai, Abiram
    Gandhi, Akash
    Low, Benjamin
    Yaghoobi, Mohammad
    Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (03):
  • [3] Myths and misconceptions in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Bornschein, Jan
    Pritchard, D. Mark
    [J]. FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 13 (03) : 245 - 253
  • [4] Dhand N. K., 2014, Sample Size Calculator for Comparing Two Paired Means
  • [5] Epidemiology of Uninvestigated and Functional Dyspepsia in Asia: Facts and Fiction
    Ghoshal, Uday C.
    Singh, Rajan
    Chang, Full-Young
    Hou, Xiaohua
    Wong, Benjamin Chun Yu
    Kachintom, Udom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2011, 17 (03) : 235 - 244
  • [6] Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer:: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gisbert, JP
    Abraira, V
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (04) : 848 - 863
  • [7] Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics
    Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 48 : 193 - 204
  • [8] Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer:: A new paradigm for inflammation-associated epithelial cancers
    Houghton, J
    Wang, TC
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 128 (06) : 1567 - 1578
  • [9] Comparison of two new rapid serology tests for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese patients
    Hung, CT
    Leung, WK
    Chan, FKL
    Sung, JJY
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2002, 34 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [10] An office-based serological test for detection of current Helicobacter pylori infection:: is it useful?
    Mumtaz, Khalid
    Abid, Shahab
    Yakoob, Javed
    Abbas, Zaigham
    Hamid, Saeed
    Islam, M.
    Shah, Hasnain A.
    Jafri, Wasim
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 18 (01) : 85 - 88