Human-wildlife interactions in urban Asia

被引:8
作者
Wierucka, Kaja [1 ,2 ]
Hatten, Chloe E. R. [1 ]
Murphy, Derek [1 ,3 ]
Allcock, John A. [1 ]
Andersson, Astrid A. [1 ]
Bojan, Jack W. N. [1 ]
Kong, Tsz Ching [1 ]
Kwok, Jun Kin [1 ]
Lam, Jack Y. K. [4 ]
Ma, Calvin H. [1 ]
Phalke, Sagarika [1 ]
Tilley, Hannah B. [1 ]
Wang, Rebecca S. [1 ]
Wang, Yifu [1 ]
Webster, Sam J. [1 ]
Mumby, Hannah S. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Dingle, Caroline [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Biol Sci, Hong Kong, SAR, Peoples R China
[2] Leibniz Inst Primate Res, German Primate Ctr, Behav Ecol & Sociobiol Unit, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Leibniz Inst Primate Res, German Primate Ctr, Cognit Ethol Lab, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Wildlife Trade & Invest, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Polit & Publ Adm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Biol Sci, Area Ecol & Biodivers, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION | 2023年 / 46卷
关键词
Urban ecology; City; Wildlife; Conflict; Coexistence; TICK-BORNE DISEASES; RHESUS MACAQUES; CONFLICT; BIODIVERSITY; FISH; LAKE; BIRDS; URBANIZATION; CONSERVATION; ASSEMBLAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02596
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
While urban areas may not seem conducive to human-wildlife interactions (HWI), rapid land use transformations can result in frequent encounters with wildlife in the context of changing habitats, as well as encounters with species that thrive in urban settings. In Asia, the processes of rapid land-use change can bring into sharp relief the juxtaposition of biodiversity hotspots with urban space. This provides an interesting context to study human-wildlife interactions, and also gives considerable scope for input into sustainable urban design worldwide. We conducted a structured review of published literature on HWI across urban southern and eastern Asia. Within the extracted literature, we investigated the framing of the interactions, as HWI have been predominantly perceived through the lens of dualistic antagonism and framed by paradigms of conflict, however there is also substantial discourse emphasizing interspecific coexistence. Invertebrates, mammals and birds occurred most commonly in the abstracts included in our review, with examples of conflict and coexistence common among all three taxonomic groups. Very few studies mentioned amphibians, reptiles and fish. Within each taxonomic group excluding amphibians, at least 50 % of interactions with humans were framed as conflicts. Humans were presented as causing conflict or negative impact on animals in the majority of studies on amphibians, birds, fish and insects, while mammals and lizards were more often considered to negatively impact humans. Our study illustrates the variety and complexity of human-wildlife interactions in Asia that need to be taken into account when planning sustainable urban designs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [61] Urban wildlife research: Past, present, and future
    Magle, Seth B.
    Hunt, Victoria M.
    Vernon, Marian
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 155 : 23 - 32
  • [62] The production of human-wildlife conflict: A political animal geography of encounter
    Margulies, Jared D.
    Karanth, Krithi K.
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2018, 95 : 153 - 164
  • [63] Seroprevalence screening for the West Nile virus in Malaysia's Orang Asli population
    Marlina, Suria
    Radzi, Siti Fatimah Muhd
    Lani, Rafidah
    Sieng, Khor Chee
    Rahim, Nurul Farhana Abdul
    Hassan, Habibi
    Chang Li-Yen
    AbuBakar, Sazaly
    Zandi, Keivan
    [J]. PARASITES & VECTORS, 2014, 7
  • [64] Wicked conflict: Using wicked problem thinking for holistic management of conservation conflict
    Mason, Tom H. E.
    Pollard, Chris R. J.
    Chimalakonda, Deepthi
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Kerr-Smith, Catherine
    Milheiras, Sergio A. G.
    Roberts, Michaela
    Ngafack, Paul R.
    Bunnefeld, Nils
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2018, 11 (06):
  • [65] Bringing nature back into cities
    Mata, Luis
    Ramalho, Cristina E.
    Kennedy, Jade
    Parris, Kirsten M.
    Valentine, Leonie
    Miller, Maddison
    Bekessy, Sarah
    Hurley, Sarrah
    Cumpston, Zena
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2020, 2 (02) : 350 - 368
  • [66] Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in free-ranging and feral cats on Amami Oshima Island, Japan
    Matsuu, Aya
    Yokota, Shin-ichi
    Ito, Keiko
    Masatani, Tatsunori
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 79 (11) : 1853 - 1856
  • [67] McDonald Robert I., 2013, P31
  • [68] Do charismatic species groups generate more cultural ecosystem service benefits?
    McGinlay, James
    Parsons, David J.
    Morris, Joe
    Hubatova, Marie
    Graves, Anil
    Bradbury, Richard B.
    Bullock, James M.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 27 : 15 - 24
  • [69] Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization
    McKinney, ML
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 127 (03) : 247 - 260
  • [70] Fish farmers highlight opportunities and warnings for urban carnivore conservation
    McMillan, Sharne E.
    Wong, Tsz-Chun
    Hau, Billy C. H.
    Bonebrake, Timothy C.
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 1 (08)