GRSR-a guideline for reporting studies results for machine learning applied to Electroencephalogram data

被引:0
作者
Rodrigues, Igor Duarte [1 ]
Silva, Juciara da Costa [2 ]
de Carvalho, Emerson Assis [3 ]
Paiva, Vinicius de Almeida [1 ]
Santana, Caio Pinheiro [4 ]
Silveira, Sabrina de Azevedo [1 ]
Bastos, Guilherme Sousa [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Inst Comp Sci, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Lab Mol & Struct Gynecol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Inst Fed Sul Minas, Comp Dept, Machado, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Syst Engn & Informat Technol, Itajuba, MG, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE COMPUTACAO APLICADA | 2023年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
Machine Learning; Electroencephalogram; standard presentation; ML; EEG; AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER; EEG; RECOGNITION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.5335/rbca.v15i2.14338
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The last decade was marked by increased neuroscience research involving machine Learning (ML) and medical images such as electroencephalogram (EEG). Since ML models tend to be sensitive to the input data, different strategies for experiment design significantly impact the results achieved. Therefore, the suppression of information about design and results makes comparing works challenging. On average, 53% of critical data was missing from the papers retrieved, making it hard to produce a fair comparison and results analysis; all papers retrieved would be considered with a high "risk of bias" and as having "concerns regarding applicability" by a Quadas-2 analysis. This corroborates the lack of a guideline to provide a standard model for data reports on the field. This work presents the GRSR, a guideline protocol to support primary studies covering critical data for studies to demonstrate when using EEG and ML to address neurological disorders. Using GRSR can reduce the chance of being evaluated as having a high risk of bias and having concern regarding applicability based on the metrics of Quadas-2. This improves the research field by allowing real comparison between reported results, narrowing the search for the best methods for neural disorders diagnoses using ML and EEG.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 35
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]  
Du K. L., 2006, NEURAL NETWORKS SOFT, P27, DOI [10.1007/1-84628-303-5_2, DOI 10.1007/1-84628-303-5_2]
[22]   Machine Learning Methods for Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using Functional and Structural MRI: A Survey [J].
Eslami, Taban ;
Almuqhim, Fahad ;
Raiker, Joseph S. ;
Saeed, Fahad .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2021, 14
[23]  
Fan J, 2017, INT CONF AFFECT, P38, DOI 10.1109/ACIIW.2017.8272583
[24]  
Ferrari R., 2019, P INT SOC MAGNETIC R
[25]   The effect of epoch length on estimated EEG functional connectivity and brain network organisation [J].
Fraschini, Matteo ;
Demuru, Matteo ;
Crobe, Alessandra ;
Marrosu, Francesco ;
Stam, Cornelis J. ;
Hillebrand, Arjan .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (03)
[26]   Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation [J].
Fushiki, Tadayoshi .
STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2011, 21 (02) :137-146
[27]  
Gaddale Jagadeeswara Rao, 2015, Perspect Clin Res, V6, P179, DOI 10.4103/2229-3485.167101
[28]  
Gao YB, 2015, IEEE INT CONF MULTI
[29]  
Ghiassian S., 2013, P 3 NIPS WORKSH MACH
[30]   Diagnosis of autism through EEG processed by advanced computational algorithms: A pilot study [J].
Grossi, Enzo ;
Olivieri, Chiara ;
Buscema, Massimo .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2017, 142 :73-79