GRSR-a guideline for reporting studies results for machine learning applied to Electroencephalogram data

被引:0
作者
Rodrigues, Igor Duarte [1 ]
Silva, Juciara da Costa [2 ]
de Carvalho, Emerson Assis [3 ]
Paiva, Vinicius de Almeida [1 ]
Santana, Caio Pinheiro [4 ]
Silveira, Sabrina de Azevedo [1 ]
Bastos, Guilherme Sousa [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Inst Comp Sci, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Lab Mol & Struct Gynecol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Inst Fed Sul Minas, Comp Dept, Machado, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Itajuba, Inst Syst Engn & Informat Technol, Itajuba, MG, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE COMPUTACAO APLICADA | 2023年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
Machine Learning; Electroencephalogram; standard presentation; ML; EEG; AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER; EEG; RECOGNITION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.5335/rbca.v15i2.14338
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The last decade was marked by increased neuroscience research involving machine Learning (ML) and medical images such as electroencephalogram (EEG). Since ML models tend to be sensitive to the input data, different strategies for experiment design significantly impact the results achieved. Therefore, the suppression of information about design and results makes comparing works challenging. On average, 53% of critical data was missing from the papers retrieved, making it hard to produce a fair comparison and results analysis; all papers retrieved would be considered with a high "risk of bias" and as having "concerns regarding applicability" by a Quadas-2 analysis. This corroborates the lack of a guideline to provide a standard model for data reports on the field. This work presents the GRSR, a guideline protocol to support primary studies covering critical data for studies to demonstrate when using EEG and ML to address neurological disorders. Using GRSR can reduce the chance of being evaluated as having a high risk of bias and having concern regarding applicability based on the metrics of Quadas-2. This improves the research field by allowing real comparison between reported results, narrowing the search for the best methods for neural disorders diagnoses using ML and EEG.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 35
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] A robust method for early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder from EEG signals based on feature selection and DBSCAN method
    Abdolzadegan, Donya
    Moattar, Mohammad Hossein
    Ghoshuni, Majid
    [J]. BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 40 (01) : 482 - 493
  • [2] Al-Hader Mahmoud, 2012, IET & IAM Asset Management Conference 2012
  • [3] A review of channel selection algorithms for EEG signal processing
    Alotaiby, Turky
    Abd El-Samie, Fathi E.
    Alshebeili, Saleh A.
    Ahmad, Ishtiaq
    [J]. EURASIP JOURNAL ON ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015,
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, 5 ISSN IEEE BIOS BIO
  • [6] EEG artifact removal-state-of-the-art and guidelines
    Antonio Urigueen, Jose
    Garcia-Zapirain, Begona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 12 (03)
  • [7] An On-Chip Processor for Chronic Neurological Disorders Assistance Using Negative Affectivity Classification
    Aslam, Abdul Rehman
    Bin Altaf, Muhammad Awais
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 14 (04) : 838 - 851
  • [8] Aslam AR, 2019, IEEE INT SYMP CIRC S
  • [9] ASSOCIATION A. P, 1980, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V3
  • [10] ASSOCIATION A. P., 1994, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4