Assessing and prioritizing biogas barriers to alleviate energy poverty in Pakistan: an integrated AHP and G-TOPSIS model

被引:8
作者
Batool, Kiran [1 ]
Zhao, Zhen-Yu [1 ]
Nureen, Naila [1 ]
Irfan, Muhammad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] ILMA Univ, Dept Business Adm, Karachi 75190, Pakistan
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Sustainable development; Delphi Approach; Socio-cultural; Institutional and Administrative barriers; Low carbon development; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FUTURE-PROSPECTS; POWER-GENERATION; TECHNOLOGY; INDIA; ADOPTION; COOKING; WASTE;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-28767-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biogas is a promising renewable technology to alleviate energy poverty. Pakistan has a capacity of 5 million bio digesters that can be installed in different farming areas. However, this target has never been achieved because many barriers hamper the biogas industry development. In previous studies, some researchers have indicated these barriers in different geographical contexts: however, these barriers are rarely examined in Pakistan. To fulfill the research gap, this study prioritizes potential barriers. Using a literature review and a modified Delphi technique, we identify 25 sub-barriers and catalog them into 5 main categories. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) prioritizes the main barriers and sub-barriers based on potential. Grey Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (G-TOPSIS) ranks the practical alternatives to combat these barriers. The study findings specify that the "financial barrier" is the top-ranked barrier among the main categories, followed by technical, socio-cultural, institutional and administrative, and environmental barriers. The overall ranking shows that the "high starting price tag" is ranked first among all sub-barriers in all categories. It has been proposed that "appropriate financial incentives" and "promotion of customized technology" would be feasible alternative solutions to combat the issues. Based on the research findings, some policy recommendations were suggested for biogas uptake in Pakistan. This study may assist policymakers, stakeholders, and government institutions in accelerating the potential of biogas energy to alleviate energy poverty in rural areas of Pakistan.
引用
收藏
页码:94669 / 94693
页数:25
相关论文
共 165 条
[1]   Development and performance evaluation of small size household portable biogas plant for domestic use [J].
Abbas, Irfan ;
Liu, Jizhan ;
Noor, Rana Shahzad ;
Faheem, Muhammad ;
Farhan, Muhammad ;
Ameen, Muhammad ;
Shaikh, Sher Ali .
BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 12 (08) :3107-3119
[2]   A Techno-Economic Model for Wind Energy Costs Analysis for Low Wind Speed Areas [J].
Adeyeye, Kehinde A. ;
Ijumba, Nelson ;
Colton, Jonathan S. .
PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (08)
[3]  
Adhikari M., 2020, J ENG APPL SCI, V15, P1844, DOI [10.36478/jeasci.2020.1844.1850, DOI 10.36478/JEASCI.2020.1844.1850]
[4]  
Agarwal S, 2023, AGR WASTE MANAG BIOR, P105
[5]  
Ahmad M U., 2020, Bailey's Ind. Oil Fat Prod, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1002/047167849X.BIO086, 10.1007/s41247-019-0066-7, DOI 10.1007/S41247-019-0066-7]
[6]   Households? perception-based factors influencing biogas adoption: Innovation diffusion framework [J].
Ahmad, Munir ;
Khan, Irfan ;
Khan, Muhammad Qaiser Shahzad ;
Jabeen, Gul ;
Jabeen, Hafiza Samra ;
Isik, Cem .
ENERGY, 2023, 263
[7]   Household-based factors affecting uptake of biogas plants in Bangladesh: Implications for sustainable development [J].
Ahmad, Munir ;
Wu, Yiyun .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 194 :858-867
[8]   Systematic analysis of factors affecting biogas technology acceptance: Insights from the diffusion of innovation [J].
Ahmed, Naseer ;
Qamar, Shoaib ;
Jabeen, Gul ;
Yan, Qingyou ;
Ahmad, Munir .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 52
[9]   Biogas energy use in Nigeria: current status, future prospects and policy implications [J].
Akinbami, JFK ;
Ilori, MO ;
Oyebisi, TO ;
Akinwumi, IO ;
Adeoti, O .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2001, 5 (01) :97-112
[10]   How and when does renewable energy affect investors willing to invest? [J].
Ali, Rizwan ;
Hussain, Rai Imtiaz ;
Hussain, Shahbaz .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2023, 17 (01) :25-40