Trade and Climate Mitigation Interactions Create Agro-Economic Opportunities With Social and Environmental Trade-Offs in Latin America and the Caribbean

被引:6
作者
Yarlagadda, Brinda [1 ,2 ]
Wild, Thomas [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Xin [2 ]
Clarke, Leon [1 ,5 ]
Cui, Ryna [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Zarrar [2 ]
Birnbaum, Abigail [6 ]
Lamontagne, Jonathan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Global Sustainabil, Sch Publ Policy, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Joint Global Change Res Inst, Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Pk, MD USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, College Pk, MD USA
[5] Bezos Earth Fund, Washington, DC USA
[6] Tufts Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Medford, MA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Latin America and the Caribbean; agricultural trade; climate mitigation; trade-offs; multi-sector; integrated assessment modeling; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL MARKETS;
D O I
10.1029/2022EF003063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region plays key roles in both meeting global agricultural demands and maintaining carbon sinks due to its abundant land and water resources. In this study we use the Global Change Analysis Model to evaluate the opportunities and challenges posed by two global-scale drivers: agricultural market integration (i.e., reduction of trade barriers) and land-based climate mitigation policy. We evaluate their potential individual and combined impacts on agricultural production and trade revenues across LAC's economies through mid-century, as well as the resulting impacts on agricultural consumers and integrated land-water-climate systems across LAC's diverse sub-regions. Increased global market integration results in increased agricultural production and trade revenues for many LAC economies, driven by their evolving comparative advantages. Climate mitigation measures on CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases increase revenues due to increased agricultural prices from land competition and emissions abatement. The combined outcomes from both drivers are complex and sometimes non-linear, highlighting the importance of understanding the interactions between multiple drivers. Our results show that increased agricultural production and trade opportunities, from either of the two drivers, pose significant trade-offs that require careful multi-sectoral planning, such as emissions reduction challenges, potential loss of livestock production when pursuing land-based climate mitigation strategies, increased consumer expenditures, and changes in land-use or water withdrawals, resulting in deforestation or water scarcity pressures. There is considerable heterogeneity in economic and environmental outcomes across LAC sub-regions and agricultural commodities, illustrating the value of considering outcomes at finer scales.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Integration of a Network-Based and an Economy-Wide Water Model to Support Decision Making on Water Resources Planning and Management in Northeastern Brazil
    Alcoforado de Moraes, Marcia M. G.
    Souza da Silva, Gerald N.
    da Cunha, Marcelo Pereira
    Dias, Nilena B. M.
    Cardoso, Terezinha F.
    Guilhoto, Joaquim J. M.
    Candido, Laise Alves
    Santos, Reinan R. S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2021, 3
  • [2] The role of international trade in managing food security risks from climate change
    Baldos, Uris Lantz C.
    Hertel, Thomas W.
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2015, 7 (02) : 275 - 290
  • [3] Net-zero deep decarbonization pathways in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities
    Bataille, Christopher
    Waisman, Henri
    Briand, Yann
    Svensson, Johannes
    Vogt-Schilb, Adrien
    Jaramillo, Marcela
    Delgado, Ricardo
    Arguello, Ricardo
    Clarke, Leon
    Wild, Thomas
    Lallana, Francisco
    Bravo, Gonzalo
    Nadal, Gustavo
    Le Treut, Gaelle
    Godinez, Guido
    Quiros-Tortos, Jairo
    Pereira, Eunice
    Howells, Mark
    Buira, Daniel
    Tovilla, Jordi
    Farbes, Jamil
    Ryan, Jones
    De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel
    Collado, Mauricio
    Requejo, Fernando
    Gomez, Ximena
    Soria, Rafael
    Villamar, Daniel
    Rochedo, Pedro
    Imperio, Mariana
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 30 (30)
  • [4] Drivers of Future Physical Water Scarcity and Its Economic Impacts in Latin America and the Caribbean
    Birnbaum, Abigail
    Lamontagne, Jonathan
    Wild, Thomas
    Dolan, Flannery
    Yarlagadda, Brinda
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [5] Do markets and trade help or hurt the global food system adapt to climate change?
    Brown, Molly E.
    Carr, Edward R.
    Grace, Kathryn L.
    Wiebe, Keith
    Funk, Christopher C.
    Attavanich, Witsanu
    Backlund, Peter
    Buja, Lawrence
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2017, 68 : 154 - 159
  • [6] Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality
    Burkholder, JoAnn
    Libra, Bob
    Weyer, Peter
    Heathcote, Susan
    Kolpin, Dana
    Thorne, Peter S.
    Wichman, Michael
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (02) : 308 - 312
  • [7] GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems
    Calvin, Katherine
    Patel, Pralit
    Clarke, Leon
    Asrar, Ghassem
    Bond-Lamberty, Ben
    Cui, Ryna Yiyun
    Di Vittorio, Alan
    Dorheim, Kalyn
    Edmonds, Jae
    Hartin, Corinne
    Hejazi, Mohamad
    Horowitz, Russell
    Iyer, Gokul
    Kyle, Page
    Kim, Sonny
    Link, Robert
    McJeon, Haewon
    Smith, Steven J.
    Snyder, Abigail
    Waldhoff, Stephanie
    Wise, Marshall
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (02) : 677 - 698
  • [8] Cango Pedro, 2023, Rev. Econ. Sociol. Rural, V61, pe251291
  • [9] CELAC, 2016, CELAC 2025 FURTH DIS
  • [10] Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense
    Clapp, Jennifer
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2017, 66 : 88 - 96