Evaluating the Effect of Timing on Point-of-Care Testing of INR

被引:1
|
作者
Son, Joanne [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Elise M. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Touro Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, New York, NY 10036 USA
[2] Touro Coll Dent Med, Hawthorne, NY USA
[3] Diasyst, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
international normalized ratio; INR; point-of-care; timing; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINE; COLLEGE;
D O I
10.1177/08971900231177198
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate if there is a difference in International Normalized Ratio (INR) readings taken within the 15 second time frame after lancing the finger vs 30-60 seconds of obtaining a blood drop utilizing a CoaguChek (R) XS Plus point-of-care (POC) INR machine in patients on warfarin therapy. Methods: All adult patients on anticoagulation therapy with warfarin who were managed in a pharmacist-run anticoagulation clinic were considered for inclusion in the study. The mean difference of INR readings taken less than 15 seconds vs between 3060 seconds after the blood drop was obtained from the finger was assessed. Results: A total of 62 pairs of INR results were included in the study. There was amean difference in INR of.076 (95% CI 0.011-.140; P = .0217) when comparing INR readings taken less than 15 seconds and between 30-60 seconds after the blood drop was obtained from the finger. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in INR readings taken less than 15 seconds vs 30-60 seconds after obtaining the blood drop when utilizing a POC INR machine. INR readings taken 30-60 seconds after obtaining a blood drop with the CoaguChek (R) XS Plus POC INR machine is not acceptable for use to monitor patients on warfarin.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 707
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INR Management of an Antiphospholipid Syndrome Patient With Point-of-Care INR Testing
    Dush, Aaron
    Erdeljac, H. Paige
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2020, 33 (03) : 390 - 391
  • [2] Performance evaluation of the microINR® point-of-care INR-testing system
    Joubert, J.
    van Zyl, M. C.
    Raubenheimer, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 40 (02) : 115 - 122
  • [3] Correction of Point-of-Care INR Results in Warfarin Patients
    Richter, Christopher
    Taylor, James
    Shuster, Jonathan
    POINT OF CARE, 2016, 15 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [4] Comparison of point-of-care testing (POCT): i-STAT® international normalized ratio (INR) vs reference laboratory INR in pediatric patients undergoing major surgery
    Spielmann, Nelly
    Mauch, Jacqueline Y.
    Madjdpour, Caveh
    Schmugge, Markus
    Albisetti, Manuela
    Weiss, Markus
    Haas, Thorsten
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (10) : 1041 - 1045
  • [5] External quality assessment of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio (INR) testing in Europe
    Stavelin, Anne
    Meijer, Piet
    Kitchen, Dianne
    Sandberg, Sverre
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 50 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [6] Point-of-care testing
    Anderson D.A.
    Crowe S.M.
    Garcia M.
    Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 2011, 8 (1) : 31 - 37
  • [7] Point-of-care test (POCT) INR: hope or illusion?
    Sant'Ana Dusse, Luci Maria
    Oliveira, Nataly Carvalho
    Alves Rios, Danyelle Romana
    Marcolino, Milena Soriano
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2012, 27 (02): : 296 - 301
  • [8] Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin A Review
    Faber, Nicholas N.
    Bulmer, Shanaya C.
    Gandhi, Mona A.
    Nagel, Angela K.
    POINT OF CARE, 2020, 19 (04): : 101 - 105
  • [9] Point-of-Care Testing in Coagulation
    Van Cott, Elizabeth M.
    CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 29 (03) : 543 - +
  • [10] The clinical significance of differences between point-of-care and laboratory INR methods in over-anticoagulated patients
    Lawrie, A. S.
    Hills, J.
    Longair, I.
    Green, L.
    Gardiner, C.
    Machin, S. J.
    Cohen, H.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2012, 130 (01) : 110 - 114