Overcoming the Digital Divide With ICT Diffusion: Multivariate and Spatial Analysis at China's Provincial Level

被引:10
作者
Wen, Jun [1 ]
Hussain, Hadi [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Renai [1 ]
Waheed, Junaid [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710000, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; cluster analysis; digital divide; information communication technology; spatial differences; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; INTERNET; TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION; TESTS; MODEL; TELECOMMUNICATIONS; DETERMINANTS; GEOGRAPHIES; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1177/21582440231159323
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Several scholars have recently recommended a transition from focusing on Internet access (access divide) and Internet use (use divide) to the tangible outcomes of Internet use (outcome divide). This study evaluates the utility of this perspective in China for investigating digital inequalities across provinces. Despite having the world's largest ICT market, digital disparities persist at the provincial, city, and county levels. This paper establishes an explanatory conceptual model of the digital divide (DD) at the provincial level and applies mapping through ArcGIS software to investigate spatial agglomeration. Spatial autocorrelation (Moran-i) is used to reveal high significance and multivariate analysis is used to investigate the key correlates. Among the provinces, a significant DD was found, which shows that provinces that are administratively sophisticated (such as Guangdong, Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu, Shandon, and Zhejiang) having a high digital development index score (IDI). Concomitantly, poverty-stricken regions and rural areas, mostly in southwest, central, and western China, have low IDI values. The factors found by this study to be most influential for improved ICT usage and outcomes are residential income (urban), e-government, literacy rate (secondary gross enrollment), and the working-age population. This indicates that socio-economic problems should be addressed first instead of institutional and innovational considerations. This study is the first to develop a conceptual model of the third-level digital divide (3-LDD) (ICT outcome) at the provincial level and utilize spatial analysis and mapping to supplement traditional methodologies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 77 条
[11]   Local Geographies of Digital Inequality [J].
Blank, Grant ;
Graham, Mark ;
Calvino, Claudio .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2018, 36 (01) :82-102
[13]   A Critical Analysis of Current Indexes for Digital Divide Measurement [J].
Bruno, Giuseppe ;
Esposito, Emilio ;
Genovese, Andrea ;
Gwebu, Kholekile L. .
INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2011, 27 (01) :16-28
[14]  
CNNIC, 2010, 36 STAT REP INT DEV
[15]  
CNNIC, 2020, 46 STAT REP INT DEV
[16]  
CNNIC, 2019, 44 STAT REP INT DEV
[17]   The Global Digital Divide: Evidence and Drivers [J].
Cruz-Jesus, Frederico ;
Oliveira, Tiago ;
Bacao, Fernando .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 (02) :1-26
[18]   Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries [J].
Cruz-Jesus, Frederico ;
Oliveira, Tiago ;
Bacao, Fernando ;
Irani, Zahir .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2017, 19 (04) :835-854
[19]   Digital divide across the European Union [J].
Cruz-Jesus, Frederico ;
Oliveira, Tiago ;
Bacao, Fernando .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 49 (06) :278-291
[20]   Extending the Digital Divide Conversation: Examining the Knowledge Gap Through Media Expectancies [J].
Eastin, Matthew S. ;
Cicchirillo, Vincent ;
Mabry, Amanda .
JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 2015, 59 (03) :416-437