Exploring the dynamics of bank liquidity holding in Islamic and conventional banks

被引:3
作者
Abdo, Khalil Yahya Mohammed [1 ,2 ]
Noman, Abu Hanifa Md [3 ]
Hanifa, Mohamed Hisham [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Finance & Banking, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Ibb Univ, Dept Finance & Banking, Ibb, Yemen
[3] Univ Southampton, Southampton Malaysia Business Sch, Malaysia Campus, Iskandar Puteri, Malaysia
关键词
Islamic banking; GMM; Speed of adjustment; Bank liquidity; NSFR; Partial adjustment model; STABLE FUNDING RATIO; RISK-TAKING; STABILITY; PROFITABILITY; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/IMEFM-02-2021-0068
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to address how Islamic banks (IBs) and conventional banks (CBs) manage their liquidity and their speed of adjusting liquidity holdings both in the short- and long term. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the partial adjustment model (PAM) on a sample of 445 banks from 17 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation countries over the period 2010-2018. Findings Results reveal that despite IBs' placement of higher short-term liquidity buffer, they experience lower net stable fund ratio (NSFR) in the long term, relative to CBs. This study's results also reveal that IBs enjoy higher and lower speed of adjustment (SOA) for NSFR in the long- and short term, respectively. Furthermore, the results suggest that bank-specific and macroeconomic factors weaken the liquidity SOA. Practical implications This study sheds light on the importance of the adjusting speed of bank liquidity in a bid to provide regulators with insights for enhancing liquidity holdings and emphasising the regulation of banks' reaction pace to attain the target buffers. Originality/value This study estimates the liquidity adjustment speed of IBs and CBs by providing a comprehensive discussion and empirical evidence across countries. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to use PAM for the assessment of liquidity holdings in IBs and the first to examine SOA of short-term liquidity holdings in the banking sector.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 575
页数:19
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [51] Funding liquidity risk and banks' risk-taking: Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks
    Smaoui, Houcem
    Mimouni, Karim
    Miniaoui, Hela
    Temimi, Akram
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2020, 64
  • [52] Song, 2017, INT MONETARY FUND, V5
  • [53] To debt or not to debt: Are Islamic banks less risky than conventional banks?
    Sorwar, Ghulam
    Pappas, Vasileios
    Pereira, John
    Nurullah, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 132 : 113 - 126
  • [54] Staff I., 2017, ENS FIN STAB COUNTR
  • [55] An empirical investigation between liquidity and key financial ratios of Islamic banks of United Arab Emirates (UAE)
    Tabash, Mosab, I
    [J]. BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC HORIZONS, 2018, 14 (03) : 713 - 724
  • [56] Profitability and risk in interest-free banking industries: a dynamic panel data analysis
    Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali
    Trad, Naama
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND MIDDLE EASTERN FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 10 (04) : 454 - 469
  • [57] Risk and profitability of Islamic banks: A religious deception or an alternative solution?
    Trad, Naama
    Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali
    Goux, Jean Francois
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESEARCH ON MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2017, 23 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [58] When liquidity risk becomes a systemic issue: Empirical evidence of bank behaviour
    van den End, Jan Willem
    Tabbae, Mostafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2012, 8 (02) : 107 - 120
  • [59] Economic uncertainty and bank risk: Evidence from emerging economies
    Wu, Ji
    Yao, Yao
    Chen, Minghua
    Jeon, Bang Nam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2020, 68