Polyhydroxyalkanoates and exopolysaccharides: An alternative for valuation of the co-production of microbial biopolymers

被引:2
|
作者
de Siqueira, Edmilson Clarindo [1 ]
Alves, Aline de Andrade [1 ]
Silva, Pablo Eugenio da Costa e [1 ]
de Barros, Maria Paloma Silva [1 ]
Houllou, Laureen Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Tecnol Estrateg Nordeste CETENE, Av Prof Luiz Freire 01,Cidade Univ, BR-50740545 Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
biopolymers; biotechnological process; co-production; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; CHAIN-LENGTH POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES; HALOFERAX-MEDITERRANEI; EPS; BIOSYNTHESIS; ACCUMULATION; GLYCEROL; WASTE; PHA;
D O I
10.1002/btpr.3412
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and exopolysaccharides (EPSs) belong to a class of abundant biopolymers produced by various fermenting microorganisms. These biocompounds have high value-added potential and can be produced concurrently. Co-production of PHAs and EPSs is a strategy employed by researchers to reduce costs associated with large-scale production. EPSs and PHAs are non-toxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable, making them suitable for various industrial sectors, including packaging and the medical and pharmaceutical industries. These biopolymers can be derived from agro-industrial residues, thus contributing to the bioeconomy by producing high-value-added products. This review investigates approaches for simultaneously synthesizing PHAs and EPSs using different carbon sources and microorganisms.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How Co-Production Regulates
    Innes, Martin
    Davies, Bethan
    McDermont, Morag
    SOCIAL & LEGAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (03) : 370 - 391
  • [32] Advances and trends in microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates and their building blocks
    Gao, Qiang
    Yang, Hao
    Wang, Chi
    Xie, Xin-Ying
    Liu, Kai-Xuan
    Lin, Ying
    Han, Shuang-Yan
    Zhu, Mingjun
    Neureiter, Markus
    Lin, Yina
    Ye, Jian-Wen
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [33] Co-production: Option or Obligation?
    Ryan, Bill
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2012, 71 (03) : 314 - 324
  • [34] Dead Sea water as a sustainable source for the production of microbial bioplastics polyhydroxyalkanoates by halophiles
    Alsafadi, Diya
    Almashaqbeh, Othman
    Oqdeh, Saba
    Mansour, Aya
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 28
  • [35] Co-production: a kind revolution
    Sophie Staniszewska
    Gary Hickey
    Pippa Coutts
    Ben Thurman
    Tina Coldham
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)
  • [36] Production of Feather-Based Biopolymers as a Direct Alternative to Synthetic Plastics
    McGauran, Thomas
    Harris, Matt
    Dunne, Nicholas
    Smyth, Beatrice M.
    Cunningham, Eoin
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (01) : 486 - 494
  • [37] Producing co-production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention
    Madden, Mary
    Morris, Steph
    Ogden, Margaret
    Lewis, David
    Stewart, Duncan
    McCambridge, Jim
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (03) : 658 - 668
  • [38] The limits of co-production: linking regulatory capacity to co-production of authoritative knowledge for environmental policy
    Large, Daniel
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, : 978 - 991
  • [39] After the Initial Start of Co-Production: A Narrative Review of the Development of Co-Production and Changes in Orientation
    Bos, Hessel
    Zwaan, Pieter
    Brandsen, Taco
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [40] Customer readiness to co-production of mobile banking services: a customer-only co-production perspective
    Andrews A. Yalley
    Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2022, 27 : 81 - 95