Comparative Techno-Economic Evaluation of a Standalone Solar Power System for Scaled Implementation in Off-Grid Areas

被引:1
作者
Sadiq, Muhammad [1 ]
Kokchang, Phimsupha [2 ]
Kittipongvises, Suthirat [3 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Grad Sch, Environm Dev & Sustainabil EDS, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Energy Res Inst, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Environm Res Inst, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
solar PV; techno-economic analysis; economy of scale; off-grid electrification; GREEN HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; WIND ENERGY; PAKISTAN;
D O I
10.3390/en16176262
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The increasing environmental concerns and dependence on fossil fuel-based energy sectors necessitate a shift towards renewable energy. Off-grid communities can particularly benefit from standalone, scaled renewable power plants. This study developed a comprehensive techno-economic framework, analyzed the objective metrics, and assessed the influence of economies of scale in solar PV power plants to electrify off-grid communities, taking Baluchistan, Pakistan, as a pilot case. Simulations and analyses were performed using the System Advisor Model (SAM). The results indicate a noteworthy reduction in the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) with increased power generation capacity. It was observed that utilizing bi-facial modules with single-axis tracking leads to a more cost-effective LCOE compared to the relatively expensive dual-axis trackers. The main cost factors identified in the analysis were capital costs, installed balance of plant (BOP), mechanical, and electrical costs. Notably, the disparity between the highest and lowest LCOE values across the six different power generation pathways amounted to approximately 38.5%. The average LCOE was determined to be 2.14 USD/kWh for fixed-mounted plants, 1.79 USD/kWh for single-axis plants, and 1.74 USD/kWh for dual-axis plants across the examined power generation capacity range. The findings can serve as a valuable benchmark, specifically for regional key stakeholders, in making informed investment decisions, formulating effective policies, and devising appropriate strategies for off-grid electrification and the development of renewable energy value chains.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of 100 MW Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant in Pakistan
    Abas, Naeem
    Rauf, Shoaib
    Saleem, Muhammad Shoaib
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Hameed, Suleman Abdul
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS OF SMART GRIDS AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2022, 7 (01):
  • [2] ACWA, POWER FINANCIAL CLOS
  • [3] A techno-economic analysis for power generation through wind energy: A case study of Pakistan
    Adnan, Muhammad
    Ahmad, Jameel
    Ali, Syed Farooq
    Imran, Muhammad
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 1424 - 1443
  • [4] Techno economic analysis of a wind-photovoltaic-biomass hybrid renewable energy system for rural electrification: A case study of Kallar Kahar
    Ahmad, Jameel
    Imran, Muhammad
    Khalid, Abdullah
    Iqbal, Waseem
    Ashraf, Syed Rehan
    Adnan, Muhammad
    Ali, Syed Farooq
    Khokhar, Khawar Siddique
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 148 : 208 - 234
  • [5] Techno-economic potential assessment of mega scale grid-connected PV power plant in five climate zones of Pakistan
    Ahmed, Naseer
    Khan, Atif Naveed
    Ahmed, Naveed
    Aslam, Adnan
    Imran, Kashif
    Sajid, Muhammad Bilal
    Waqas, Adeel
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 237
  • [6] Assessment of wind-to-hydrogen (Wind-H2) generation prospects in the Sultanate of Oman
    Ahshan, Razzaqul
    Onen, Ahmet
    Al-Badi, Abdullah H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 200 : 271 - 282
  • [7] Effects of Pakistan's energy crisis on farm households
    Ali, Akhter
    Rahut, Dil Bahadur
    Imtiaz, Muhammad
    [J]. UTILITIES POLICY, 2019, 59
  • [8] A techno-economic assessment of hybrid energy systems in rural Pakistan
    Ali, Fahad
    Ahmar, Muhammad
    Jiang, Yuexiang
    AlAhmad, Mohammad
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 215
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, RENEWABLE POWER GENE
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2021, U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System and Energy Storage Cost Benchmark: Q1 2020