Source parameters of the MS6.1 Lushan earthquake on June 1, 2022 in Sichuan Province and its tectonic implications

被引:2
作者
Xu YingCai [1 ]
Guo XiangYun [2 ]
机构
[1] Earthquake Agcy Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reg, Yinchuan 750001, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION | 2023年 / 66卷 / 08期
关键词
M(S)6.1 Lushan earthquake; Double-difference relocation; Focal mechanism; Sliding property; Seismogenic structure; FOCAL MECHANISMS; SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE; AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCES; INVERSION; STRESS; FAULT; DEFORMATION; RELOCATION; ALGORITHM; LOCATION;
D O I
10.6038/cjg2022Q0454
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On June 1, 2022, an M(S)6.1 earthquake hit the Lushan County, Sichuan Province, southwestern China. Based on the data from Sichuan Regional Seismic Network, the S6.1 Lushan earthquake sequence with M-L = 1.0 (June 1-7, 2022) was relocated by HypoDD method. Focal mechanisms and centroid depths of the M-S >= 3.0 earthquakes were inverted by the gCAP (generalized Cut And Paste) method. Meanwhile, the stability of focal mechanism of the mainshock was evaluated by Bootstrap method and the minimum rotation angles of the central solution of multiple focal mechanisms from various sources were calculated. Relative shear stress and normal stress on nodal planes from focal mechanisms of the 2022 M(S)6.1 Lushan earthquake and the 2013 M(S)7.0 Lushan earthquake were calculated under the contemporary regional stress field, and the seismogenic fault plane was fitted by relocated distribution of Lushan earthquake sequence. The seismogenic structure of the 2022 M(S)6.1 Lushan earthquake sequence was analyzed. The main results are as follows: (1) The relocation distribution show that the aftershocks are mainly along Shuangshi-Dachuan fault and the predominant direction is to NE-SW. The events distribute in the 10 similar to 18 km depth range and the average depth of relocated earthquakes is 14.5 km. The shallow earthquakes distribute in the northwest and the deep in the southeast, and Lushan M(S)6.1 mainshock and M(S)4.5 aftershock are located in the southeast of the aftershocks region. Most of aftershocks are located in the northwest of the mainshock. The earthquake sequence shows the characteristics of unilateral rupture, and the fault plane dips to SE. (2) Both Bootstrap method and the minimum spatial rotation angle of the central solution of multiple focal mechanisms show that the error of the mainshock focal mechanism obtained by gCAP method is small, indicating that the results are reliable and stable. The mainshock focal mechanism solution is strike: 228 degrees, dip: 46 degrees and rake: 106 degrees for nodal plane I, and strike: 26 degrees, dip: 46 degrees and rake: 74 degrees for nodal plane II, and the centroid depth is 12 km while the moment magnitude is M(W)5.8. The focal mechanism inversion results show that the MS >= 3.0 earthquakes are mainly thrust earthquakes and the centroid depths are in 11 similar to 13 km range. P-axis azimuths are primarily in NW-SE direction which is consistent with the regional stress field. (3) Simulation on relationship between focal mechanisms and stress regimes reveals that the shape of fault plane of the 2022 M(S)6.1 Lushan earthquake and the 2013 M(S)7.0 Lushan earthquake inhibits the full release of stress. According to available geologic structure and results above, it is concluded that nodal plane ? of focal mechanism of 2022 MS6.1 Lushan earthquake is the seismogenic fault of earthquake. The seismogenic structure of the 2022 MS6.1 Lushan earthquake sequence is probably a NE-striking blind thrust fault which is dipping towards SE. It also may be related to the secondary backthrust fault on the NE-striking and NW-dipping seismogenic structure of the 2013 M(S)7.0 Lushan earthquake.
引用
收藏
页码:3202 / 3217
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Guo X., 2022, FOCAL MECH DATA SET, DOI [10.12080/nedc.11.ds. 2022.0004, DOI 10.12080/NEDC.11.DS.2022.0004]
  • [12] Institute of Geophysics China Earthquake Administration, 2022, SCI TECHN SUPP BRIEF
  • [13] Institute of Geophysics China Earthquake Administration, 2022, SOURC CHAR M6 1 LUSH
  • [14] Jiang HK, 2006, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V49, P1110
  • [15] Possible link between long-term and short-term water injections and earthquakes in salt mine and shale gas site in Changning, south Sichuan Basin, China
    Lei, XingLin
    Wang, ZhiWei
    Su, JinRong
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY PHYSICS, 2019, 3 (06) : 510 - 525
  • [16] [黎厚富 Li Houfu], 2020, [地震工程学报, China Earthquake Engineering Journal], V42, P1497
  • [17] Anomalous focal mechanism of the May 2011 Mw 5. 7 deep earthquake in Northeastern China regional waveform inversion and possible mechanism
    Li Sheng-Qiang
    Chen Qi-Fu
    Zhao Li
    Zhu Lu-Pei
    Gao Jin-Zhe
    Li Min-Feng
    Liu Gui-Ping
    Wang Bin
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2013, 56 (09): : 2959 - 2970
  • [18] [刘瑞丰 Liu Ruifeng], 2013, [地震学报, Acta Seismologica Sinica], V35, P652
  • [19] A more accurate relocation of the 2013 M s7.0 Lushan, Sichuan, China, earthquake sequence, and the seismogenic structure analysis
    Long, F.
    Wen, X. Z.
    Ruan, X.
    Zhao, M.
    Yi, G. X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2015, 19 (03) : 653 - 665
  • [20] Hypocentral location and source mechanism of the MS7.0 Lushan earthquake sequence
    Lu Jian
    Wang Xiao-Shan
    Su Jin-Rong
    Pan Lin-Shan
    Li Zheng
    Yin Li-Wen
    Zeng Xin-Fu
    Deng Hui
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2013, 56 (05): : 1753 - 1763