Dynamic Output State Classification for Quantum Computers

被引:0
作者
Menendez, Hector D. [1 ]
Bello, Luciano [2 ]
Clark, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Informat, London, England
[2] IBM Quantum, Zurich Res Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] UCL, Dept Comp Sci, London, England
来源
2023 IEEE/ACM 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON QUANTUM SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, Q-SE | 2023年
关键词
quantum computation; error mitigation; clustering;
D O I
10.1109/Q-SE59154.2023.00009
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Quantum computers promise a potentially disruptive approach to improving computation in fields such as physics, chemistry, cryptography, optimisation, and machine learning. However, testing quantum computations for faults is currently impractical because of the existence of noise and errors associated with the output. Executing in a quantum system a circuit with only a few valid output states can generate a significant number of implausible states that have zero probability in an ideal computation. Among other sources of noise, readout errors come from the difficulty of discriminating a measurement between 0 and 1 for the different qubits. These issues are affected by readout drift, requiring regular recalibration of the process. In this paper, we provide a novel technique for postcomputation analysis of the output probability distributions that permits better discrimination of kerneled data, delaying the need for recalibration. We achieve this by altering the linear discrimination of the final output states by way of a dynamic state selection process that combines Gaussian mixture models with a probability threshold. As an initial assessment of the technique we examine its effect on three to five qubits GHZ states. Our results on almost every one of nine IBM quantum computers show that the number of implausible states is reduced significantly and that the resulting probability distribution is closer to the expected one.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   Unified approach to data-driven quantum error mitigation [J].
Lowe, Angus ;
Gordon, Max Hunter ;
Czarnik, Piotr ;
Arrasmith, Andrew ;
Coles, Patrick J. ;
Cincio, Lukasz .
PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2021, 3 (03)
[12]  
MacQueen J., 1967, P 5 BERK S MATH STAT, V1, P281
[13]   The expectation-maximization algorithm [J].
Moon, TK .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 1996, 13 (06) :47-60
[14]  
Patel T, 2020, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 USENIX ANNUAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, P705
[15]   DISQ: A Novel Quantum Output State Classification Method on IBM Quantum Computers using OpenPulse [J].
Patel, Tirthak ;
Tiwari, Devesh .
2020 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AIDED-DESIGN (ICCAD), 2020,
[16]   Benchmarking Quantum Computers and the Impact of Quantum Noise [J].
Resch, Salonik ;
Karpuzcu, Ulya R. .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2021, 54 (07)
[17]   Fundamental limits of quantum error mitigation [J].
Takagi, Ryuji ;
Endo, Suguru ;
Minagawa, Shintaro ;
Gu, Mile .
NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2022, 8 (01)
[18]   Minimum Quantum Run-Time Characterization and Calibration via Restless Measurements with Dynamic Repetition Rates [J].
Tornow, Caroline ;
Kanazawa, Naoki ;
Shanks, William E. ;
Egger, Daniel J. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED, 2022, 17 (06)